Abstract:BackgroundEndoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and its consequent unfolded protein response (UPR) are believed to be associated with progression, survival and chemoresistance of a variety of tumor cells through multiple cellular processes, including autophagy. Therefore, the ER stress-autophagy pathway presents a potential molecular target for therapeutic intervention. The objective of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of ER stress and autophagy modulators in the context of pancreatic ductal ade… Show more
“…An association between hypoxia‐induced chemoresistance and autophagy is becoming increasingly apparent . Moreover, hypoxia‐associated genes and autophagy are implicated with a less favourable outcome in PDAC . PTBs are known to regulate gene expression by binding to hypoxia‐related transcripts ; therefore, we also studied the role of PTBP3 in the development of PDAC and therapeutic resistance in tumour tissue and in pancreatic cancer cell lines under hypoxic stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with our results, the anti‐proliferative effect of gemcitabine was significantly increased when autophagy was inhibited. Thakur et al found that the addition of sunitinib or chloroquine to gemcitabine significantly increased survival in an animal pancreatic cancer model without an increase in toxicity. The authors proposed that sunitinib and chloroquine can reduce tumour growth through the suppression of autophagy and increased apoptosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34][35][36] Moreover, hypoxia-associated genes and autophagy are implicated with a less favourable outcome in PDAC. 37,38 PTBs are known to regulate gene expression by binding to hypoxia-related transcripts 20 ; therefore, we also studied the role of PTBP3 in the development of PDAC and therapeutic resistance in tumour tissue and in pancreatic cancer cell lines under hypoxic stress. In addition, we determined whether PTBP3 influenced the stress response against hypoxia and the cytotoxic effects of gemcitabine and investigated whether PTBP3 expression promoted the proliferation of PDAC cells and its direct influence on the expression of ATG12.…”
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tumours exhibit a high level of heterogeneity which is associated with hypoxia and strong resistance to chemotherapy. The RNA splicing protein polypyrimidine tract‐binding protein 3 (PTBP3) regulates hypoxic gene expression by selectively binding to hypoxia‐regulated transcripts. We have investigated the role of PTBP3 in tumour development and chemotherapeutic resistance in human PDAC tissues and pancreatic cancer cells. In addition, we determined the sensitivity of cancer cells to gemcitabine with differential levels of PTBP3 and whether autophagy and hypoxia affect gemcitabine resistance in vitro. PTBP3 expression was higher in human pancreatic cancer than in paired adjacent tissues. PTBP3 overexpression promoted PDAC proliferation in vitro and tumour growth in vivo, whereas PTBP3 depletion had opposing effects. Hypoxia significantly increased the expression of PTBP3 in pancreatic cancer cells in vitro. Under hypoxic conditions, cells were more resistance to gemcitabine. Knockdown of PTBP3 results in decreased resistance to gemcitabine, which was attributed to attenuated autophagy. We propose that PTBP3 binds to multiple sites in the 3′‐UTR of ATG12 resulting in overexpression. PTBP3 increases cancer cell proliferation and autophagic flux in response to hypoxic stress, which contributes to gemcitabine resistance.
“…An association between hypoxia‐induced chemoresistance and autophagy is becoming increasingly apparent . Moreover, hypoxia‐associated genes and autophagy are implicated with a less favourable outcome in PDAC . PTBs are known to regulate gene expression by binding to hypoxia‐related transcripts ; therefore, we also studied the role of PTBP3 in the development of PDAC and therapeutic resistance in tumour tissue and in pancreatic cancer cell lines under hypoxic stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with our results, the anti‐proliferative effect of gemcitabine was significantly increased when autophagy was inhibited. Thakur et al found that the addition of sunitinib or chloroquine to gemcitabine significantly increased survival in an animal pancreatic cancer model without an increase in toxicity. The authors proposed that sunitinib and chloroquine can reduce tumour growth through the suppression of autophagy and increased apoptosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34][35][36] Moreover, hypoxia-associated genes and autophagy are implicated with a less favourable outcome in PDAC. 37,38 PTBs are known to regulate gene expression by binding to hypoxia-related transcripts 20 ; therefore, we also studied the role of PTBP3 in the development of PDAC and therapeutic resistance in tumour tissue and in pancreatic cancer cell lines under hypoxic stress. In addition, we determined whether PTBP3 influenced the stress response against hypoxia and the cytotoxic effects of gemcitabine and investigated whether PTBP3 expression promoted the proliferation of PDAC cells and its direct influence on the expression of ATG12.…”
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tumours exhibit a high level of heterogeneity which is associated with hypoxia and strong resistance to chemotherapy. The RNA splicing protein polypyrimidine tract‐binding protein 3 (PTBP3) regulates hypoxic gene expression by selectively binding to hypoxia‐regulated transcripts. We have investigated the role of PTBP3 in tumour development and chemotherapeutic resistance in human PDAC tissues and pancreatic cancer cells. In addition, we determined the sensitivity of cancer cells to gemcitabine with differential levels of PTBP3 and whether autophagy and hypoxia affect gemcitabine resistance in vitro. PTBP3 expression was higher in human pancreatic cancer than in paired adjacent tissues. PTBP3 overexpression promoted PDAC proliferation in vitro and tumour growth in vivo, whereas PTBP3 depletion had opposing effects. Hypoxia significantly increased the expression of PTBP3 in pancreatic cancer cells in vitro. Under hypoxic conditions, cells were more resistance to gemcitabine. Knockdown of PTBP3 results in decreased resistance to gemcitabine, which was attributed to attenuated autophagy. We propose that PTBP3 binds to multiple sites in the 3′‐UTR of ATG12 resulting in overexpression. PTBP3 increases cancer cell proliferation and autophagic flux in response to hypoxic stress, which contributes to gemcitabine resistance.
“…6,7 Autophagy is a conserved physiological process that can maintain homeostasis by degrading damaged protein and organelles, which depends on the regulation of autophagy-related protein including microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3), Beclin 1, and p62. 6,7 Autophagy is a conserved physiological process that can maintain homeostasis by degrading damaged protein and organelles, which depends on the regulation of autophagy-related protein including microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3), Beclin 1, and p62.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For research on cancer chemotherapy, accumulating evidence has confirmed a paradoxical role of autophagy: it can act as a prosurvival or prodeath contributor to anticancer therapy. 6 Inconsequently, suppressing of autophagy enhances drug resistance in gastric cancer cells. 9 Analogously, targeting endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated autophagy elevates the effectiveness of sunitinib and gemcitabine on pancreatic cancer.…”
Malignant glioma is a severe type of brain tumor with a grim prognosis. The occurrence of resistance compromises the efficacy of chemotherapy for glioma. Long noncoding RNA growth arrest‐specific 5 (GAS5) has recently become an attractive target for cancer therapy by regulating cell growth, invasion, and migration. Nevertheless, its role in glioma chemoresistance remains elusive. In the current study, the expression of GAS5 was decreased in glioma cell lines, and lower levels of GAS5 were observed in U138 and LN18 glioma cells that had low sensitivity to cisplatin. Functional assay confirmed that knockdown of GAS5 enhanced cell resistance to cisplatin in U87 cells, which had a relatively high expression of GAS5. Conversely, elevation of GAS5 increased cell sensitivity to cisplatin in U138 cells that had a relatively low expression of GAS5. Mechanistically, cisplatin exposure evoked excessive autophagy concomitant with an increase in autophagy‐related LC3II expression and a decrease in autophagy substrate p62 expression, which was reversely muted after GAS5 overexpression. In addition, GAS5 restored cisplatin‐inhibited mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation. Preconditioning with mTOR antagonist rapamycin engendered not only mTOR inhibition but also abrogated GAS5‐mediated depression in cisplatin‐evoked autophagy. Notably, blocking the mTOR pathway also attenuated GAS5‐increased sensitivity to cisplatin in U138 cells. Cumulatively, these findings indicate that GAS5 may blunt the resistance of glioma cells to cisplatin by suppressing excessive autophagy through the activation of mTOR signaling, implying a promising therapeutic strategy against chemoresistance in glioma.
Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies have made significant progress in cancer treatment. However, tumor adjuvant therapy still faces challenges due to the intrinsic heterogeneity of cancer, genomic instability, and the formation of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Functional materials possess unique biological properties such as long circulation times, tumor‐specific targeting, and immunomodulation. The combination of functional materials with natural substances and nanotechnology has led to the development of smart biomaterials with multiple functions, high biocompatibilities, and negligible immunogenicities, which can be used for precise cancer treatment. Recently, subcellular structure‐targeting functional materials have received particular attention in various biomedical applications including the diagnosis, sensing, and imaging of tumors and drug delivery. Subcellular organelle‐targeting materials can precisely accumulate therapeutic agents in organelles, considerably reduce the threshold dosages of therapeutic agents, and minimize drug‐related side effects. This review provides a systematic and comprehensive overview of the research progress in subcellular organelle‐targeted cancer therapy based on functional nanomaterials. Moreover, it explains the challenges and prospects of subcellular organelle‐targeting functional materials in precision oncology. We believe that our review will serve as an excellent cutting‐edge guide for researchers in the field of subcellular organelle‐targeted cancer therapy.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.