2018
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Articulating citizen participation in national anti-microbial resistance plans: a comparison of European countries

Abstract: Citizen roles in AMR plans are not fully articulated. Documents could employ direct language to emphasise social or collective responsibilities in optimal antibiotic use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of NAPs by Chua et al revealed varying levels of stakeholder participation across the ASEAN member states, with countries such as Singapore acknowledging a need for better engagement from a wide range of stakeholders, including those from the community [ 17 ]. This issue was also highlighted in other similar studies [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The analysis of NAPs by Chua et al revealed varying levels of stakeholder participation across the ASEAN member states, with countries such as Singapore acknowledging a need for better engagement from a wide range of stakeholders, including those from the community [ 17 ]. This issue was also highlighted in other similar studies [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…On the other hand, citizen engagement in AMR research should be further stimulated at different levels. Within most national action plans for AMR, citizens are expected to be recipients of awareness activities or education interventions rather than actively engage in proactive self-care measures to reduce the need of antibiotics [ 50 ]. In some countries the societal mission of universities has been long neglected and the broadening of science-communication activities by academics should be strengthened.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, the most basic governance strategy in the AMR field is to identify the key challenges, stakeholders and relevant policy sectors in a national action plan (NAP). 5 , 6 While NAPs vary extensively in style and substance in Europe—some directly mimicking while some are highly independent of the Global Action Plan (GAP) 7 , 8 —and the extent to which they are successfully implemented, 9 we know very little about how they address the international dimensions of AMR. Current scholarship has shown how countries vary in their overall policy design, implementation tools, and monitoring and evaluation mechanisms 10 , 11 ; and the extent to which NAPs manage to integrate and implement the OH perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%