2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-018-3384-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stromal cells for the prophylaxis of chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for the prophylaxis of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Six studies involving 365 patients were included. The pooled results showed that MSCs significantly reduced the incidence of cGVHD (risk ratio [RR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46 to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MSCs were infused at different time points from HSCT (within 24 h, at a median time of 28 days, or with multiple infusions at different time points). The analysis showed that infusion of MSCs significantly reduced the incidence of chronic GvHD (cGvHD) and there was a trend of longer overall survival in MSC-treated patients (33). Importantly, the meta-analysis on different sub-groups demonstrated that these favorable outcomes were significantly associated with late MSC administrations, thus supporting a more effective role of MSCs when licensed by a specific microenvironment developed after HSCT.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Mscsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MSCs were infused at different time points from HSCT (within 24 h, at a median time of 28 days, or with multiple infusions at different time points). The analysis showed that infusion of MSCs significantly reduced the incidence of chronic GvHD (cGvHD) and there was a trend of longer overall survival in MSC-treated patients (33). Importantly, the meta-analysis on different sub-groups demonstrated that these favorable outcomes were significantly associated with late MSC administrations, thus supporting a more effective role of MSCs when licensed by a specific microenvironment developed after HSCT.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Mscsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…After thousands of infusions, the most convincing conclusion is that MSCs are well-tolerated and safe for patients. Major infectious events, secondary neoplasms, or malignancy relapse do not seem to increase after MSC therapy (33,186). However, available data on MSC use in GvHD treatment represent the paradigm of the limitations of our current use of MSCs in most clinical applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, analysis of a subset of CD4+ CD25+ CD127− regulatory T cells (Treg) and CD27+ memory B-lymphocytes was higher in the UC-MSC treated group although the proportion of total T cells and B cells remained unchanged. Wang et al [216] conducted a meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled trials to evaluate the safety of MSC prophylaxis of cGVHD in 365 patients undergoing allo-HSCT. Beneficial prophylactic effects were seen with high dose UC-MSCs but not with low dose BM-MSCs.…”
Section: The Safety Of Msc Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were initially described, in the 1960s, as plastic-adherent and fibroblast-like cells with clonogenic potential in vitro [10]. Today, they are recognized as a part of stem cell niches in the bone marrow [11] and are known to play a role in immunomodulation [12], as demonstrated by the prominent contribution of the cells in reversing graft-versus-host-disease [13]. Scientific interest in MSCs has developed in recent years, making them one of the most-studied human cell types related to cell-based therapy [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%