2018
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201800137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of seized cocaine samples using electrophoresis microchips with integrated contactless conductivity detection

Abstract: This study describes the development of a new analytical method for the separation and detection of cocaine (COC) and its adulterants, or cutting agents, using microchip electrophoresis (ME) devices coupled with capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection (C D). All the experiments were carried out using a glass commercial ME device containing two pairs of integrated sensing electrodes. The running buffer composed of 20 mmol/L amino-2-(hydroxymethyl) propane-1,3-diol and 10 mmol/L 3,4-dimethoxycinn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, minimal carryover was observed across all experiments and the expected run time per sample is 40 s with an additional (2-3) min with positive identification. Further considerations in instrument portability could be explored, and many groups have utilized microfluidic electrophoresis coupled with C 4 D for the detection of relevant compounds for wipe-based sampling, e.g., illicit drugs [35,36]. However, a decrease in sensitivity could result using a microfluidic platform due the fast migration of inorganic anions [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, minimal carryover was observed across all experiments and the expected run time per sample is 40 s with an additional (2-3) min with positive identification. Further considerations in instrument portability could be explored, and many groups have utilized microfluidic electrophoresis coupled with C 4 D for the detection of relevant compounds for wipe-based sampling, e.g., illicit drugs [35,36]. However, a decrease in sensitivity could result using a microfluidic platform due the fast migration of inorganic anions [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pinheiro et al carried out μCE of inorganic anions present in explosive residues with commercial glass microchips and contactless conductivity detection; however, the limit of detection of 2.5 μM was relatively high. Moreira et al developed an approach for the separation and detection of illicit drugs by using commercial glass μCE devices that contained two pairs of integrated sensing electrodes for contactless conductivity detection. This method has promise for on-site forensic investigation, provided analyte concentrations are >40 μM.…”
Section: Inorganic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aqueous samples offer advantages as these solutions can be representative of bulk or seized drug samples, and can be easily prepared by dissolving the analyte in solution. A variety of non-biological matrices were reported including water [20,34,36,[38][39][40][41][42], acetonitrile [25,29,34], phosphate buffered saline (PBS) [44][45][46][47], methanol [27,34], combination of acetone and deionised water [31], 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES) buffer [48] well as beverages including energy drinks [37] and fruit juices [37] to represent 'spiked drink' samples. Only 7% of the publications using LOC devices tested powder drug samples.…”
Section: Non-biological Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%