2018
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1807115115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast charging of lithium-ion batteries at all temperatures

Abstract: Fast charging is a key enabler of mainstream adoption of electric vehicles (EVs). None of today's EVs can withstand fast charging in cold or even cool temperatures due to the risk of lithium plating. Efforts to enable fast charging are hampered by the trade-off nature of a lithium-ion battery: Improving low-temperature fast charging capability usually comes with sacrificing cell durability. Here, we present a controllable cell structure to break this trade-off and enable lithium plating-free (LPF) fast chargin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
136
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
136
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commensurate with visual observations shown in Figure 7, the model predicts significant amounts of lithium plating except for cells operating at 50 °C. Increasing temperature significantly mitigates lithium plating due to improvements in the electrolyte transport properties [ 12,13,29 ] and graphite transport/kinetic properties. Further model development is required to better understand the reversibility of the lithium‐stripping process and the effect of this on cell lifetime.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commensurate with visual observations shown in Figure 7, the model predicts significant amounts of lithium plating except for cells operating at 50 °C. Increasing temperature significantly mitigates lithium plating due to improvements in the electrolyte transport properties [ 12,13,29 ] and graphite transport/kinetic properties. Further model development is required to better understand the reversibility of the lithium‐stripping process and the effect of this on cell lifetime.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the graphite is cycled from the open circuit potential (OCP) to 5 mV at a rate of 1 mV/s, held at a constant voltage (CV) of 5 mV for 3.5 hours, and then returned to the OCP at a rate of 0.5 mV/s. Thus a voltage ramp replaces the constant current (CC) phase of the CCCV 31 charging protocol used for both standard and fast charging. Relative to CC, the voltage ramp gives superior predictability when testing small, individual graphite flakes whose electrochemistry might not dominate the parasitic chemistry on, e.g., the metal electrode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative to CC, the voltage ramp gives superior predictability when testing small, individual graphite flakes whose electrochemistry might not dominate the parasitic chemistry on, e.g., the metal electrode. These scanning conditions were chosen to minimize degradation of the graphite 32 and to represent fast 31 but not extreme charging conditions. Full charge occurs in about an hour, while the max current of 15 nA, sustained, would lithiate the flake in 10 minutes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the capacity losses after the first 2 years' storage at 23 • C and 40 days' storage at 60 • C were picked, respectively, to calculate the degradation rates, then extrapolated the activation energy. The remaining data is not used in this case, and similar ways of validating the Arrhenius model and extracting the model parameters are seen in [33]. However, when the capacity losses at 23 • C from the 3rd year to the 5th year, and 60 • C from the 60th day to the 100th day are chosen for calculation, the AF and activation energy are changed to 15.6 and 0.632 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%