2018
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.18.19820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectrum of Pitfalls, Pseudolesions, and Misdiagnoses in Noncirrhotic Liver

Abstract: When assessing focal hepatic lesions, it is important to avoid pitfalls and misdiagnoses that can alter the management plan. Helpful strategies for avoiding pitfalls include paying close attention to the clinical history of the patient, carefully evaluating all of the available imaging studies, and being aware of the various radiologic mimics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the first follow-up after discharge, no lesions were found in the previously aforementioned area, and here show the limitations of CEUS, as in our case it did not characterize it furtherly. It is well documented that there are malignant FLLs and pseudolesions, that mimic benign lesions, such as Cystic Liver Metastases and Metastases with Delayed Phase Enhancement[ 14 ]. Thus a definite diagnosis and classification of the lesion should be the goal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the first follow-up after discharge, no lesions were found in the previously aforementioned area, and here show the limitations of CEUS, as in our case it did not characterize it furtherly. It is well documented that there are malignant FLLs and pseudolesions, that mimic benign lesions, such as Cystic Liver Metastases and Metastases with Delayed Phase Enhancement[ 14 ]. Thus a definite diagnosis and classification of the lesion should be the goal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imaging features of the above tumors overlap with IPT-like FDC tumors, and the first three are the main differential diagnosis. IPTs of the liver usually appears as heterogeneous enhancing tumors with uneven peripheral enhancements[22]. Suspicion should be high for IPT in patients with low grade fever, jaundice, hepatomegaly, weight loss or leukocytosis[23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suspicion should be high for IPT in patients with low grade fever, jaundice, hepatomegaly, weight loss or leukocytosis[23]. Typical HCC is characterized by portal phase washout, elevated AFP and threshold growth at follow-up imaging[22,24]. However, atypical HCC is sometimes difficult to distinguish from sarcomas and metastases[24,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two important features that distinguish THEDs from malignancy are a lack of mass effect, as evidenced by vessels coursing through the area unimpeded, and the lack of signal change or altered enhancement on other MRI sequences. Although usually idiopathic, THEDs can arise from other processes, such as hypervascular tumors, abscesses, and vascular thrombosis 59 . When applicable in patients with chronic liver disease, THEDs are classified as LI‐RADS 1 when definite and 2 when probable 24…”
Section: Vascular‐related Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On contrast‐enhanced MRI, third inflow can result in geographic hyperenhancement that can mimic a neoplasm 60 . This is particularly pronounced in patients with superior vena cava obstruction, which results in systemic venous blood being diverted to thoracic and upper abdominal wall collaterals, then in part to the liver via third inflow 59 . When contrast media is injected in an upper‐extremity vein, there is early hyperenhancement of hepatic segment IV, termed the hot quadrate sign on technetium sulfur colloid examinations.…”
Section: Vascular‐related Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%