2018
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30295-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral arsenic plus retinoic acid versus intravenous arsenic plus retinoic acid for non-high-risk acute promyelocytic leukaemia: a non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
102
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
102
2
Order By: Relevance
“…13,17 In another study that recruited patients of all risk categories, ATRA and iv As 2 O 3 were administered to low-and intermediate-risk patients, whereas high-risk patients received gemtuzumab ozogamicin in addition. 24 We did not have any relapses in our oral As 2 O 3 induction cohort. In our arsenic induction cohort, 12 patients did not receive chemotherapy, with 4 of them belonging to the highrisk category.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13,17 In another study that recruited patients of all risk categories, ATRA and iv As 2 O 3 were administered to low-and intermediate-risk patients, whereas high-risk patients received gemtuzumab ozogamicin in addition. 24 We did not have any relapses in our oral As 2 O 3 induction cohort. In our arsenic induction cohort, 12 patients did not receive chemotherapy, with 4 of them belonging to the highrisk category.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Another oral arsenic formulation, oral arsenic realgar-indigo naturalis, was shown in combination with ATRA without chemotherapy to be noninferior to iv As 2 O 3 in non-high-risk patients with newly diagnosed APL. 24 We did not have any relapses in our oral As 2 O 3 induction cohort. This contrasts with relapse rates of 1% to 4% in studies of frontline iv As 2 O 3 , 12-17 with relapses occurring mostly in high-risk patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…So far, more than 5,000 patients have been treated with RIF-based regimens with excellent results and very favorable toxicity profiles, especially when considering the potential of a completely chemo-free regimen [55]. An important milestone has been the demonstration of non-inferiority of ATRA/ ATO versus ATRA/RIF treatment in terms of 2-year EFS in newly diagnosed patients with APL (94 vs. 97%, respectively) [58]. These results were confirmed by the use of RIF/ATRA in standard-risk and later in high-risk patients [59,60].…”
Section: Oral Ato Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If up to 16% of patients with APL experience a QTc prolongation of any grade after ATO administration [38], no cardiac toxicity has been reported using RIF [59,60]. On the other hand, liver toxicity still occurs with ATRA/ RIF, at a milder degree than with ATRA/ATO [58]. A further advantage of the ATRA/RIF combination is the applicability of this entirely chemotherapy-free, outpatient-based post-remission strategy, attractive in terms of quality of life and health system-related costs, in particular for children or elderly patients [61].…”
Section: Oral Ato Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arsenic sulfide is a kind of mineral drug that can be orally administered and has shown certain therapeutic effects of the treatment on several types of leukemia . However, As 4 S 4 leads to low bioavailability due to its poor water solubility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%