2 26 Abstract 27 The aim of the present study was to describe the genetic structure of the Norwegian 28 population using genotypes from 6369 unrelated individuals with detailed information 29 about places of residence. Using standard single marker-and haplotype-based 30 approaches, we report evidence of two regions with distinctive patterns of genetic 31 variation, one in the far northeast, and another in the south of Norway, as indicated by 32 fixation indices, haplotype sharing, homozygosity and effective population size. We 33 detect and quantify a component of Uralic Sami ancestry that is enriched in the North.34 On a finer scale, we find that rates of migration have been affected by topography like 35 mountain ridges. In the broader Scandinavian context, we detect elevated relatedness 36 between the mid-and northern border areas towards Sweden. The main finding of this 37 study is that despite Norway's long maritime history and as a former Danish territory, 38 the region closest to mainland Europe in the south appears to have been the most 39 isolated region in Norway, highlighting the open sea as a barrier to gene flow. 40 41 43 3 44 Introduction 45 Population sub-structures can give rise to false positive associations in association46 studies of genetic variants (1), can reveal historical patterns of population movements 47 (2, 3), and estimates of ancestry have potential in informing genealogy and forensic 48 genetics (4). Natural features, such as the sea and mountain ridges, tend to limit gene 49 flow between groups of individuals (5), resulting in reproductive isolation and 50 divergence in allele frequencies over time. This divergence may be especially 51 pronounced in smaller populations, due to greater genetic drift. Among the populations 52 in Northern Europe, geographically structured differences are primarily due to isolation 53 by distance, but may also result from founding effects and subsequent isolation (6, 7).54 Further, isolation and reduction of gene flow within a geographical area can also 55 manifest an increase in recessive Mendelian disorders (8, 9) and founder mutations.56 Indeed, geographically clustered and expanding BRCA1 founder mutations have been 57 previously reported for Norway (10, 11).
58Norway is one of the most sparsely populated countries in Europe, but little is 59 known about its main genetic structure. Its relatively large landmass has the longest 60 coastline in Europe, but has a population of only ~5 million, that includes one of the 61 few indigenous peoples of Europe, the Sami. With unfavorable climatic conditions, 62 combined with the third least arable land in Europe, Norway has provided its people 63 with limited agricultural opportunities. Historically, farms were fragmented through 64 inheritance to ever smaller units, ultimately resulting in unsustainable population 65 growth, especially during the 19 th century. Combined with poverty, this motivated the 66 mass emigration of a substantial fraction (1/3) of the population to the Americas during 67 the 19th c...