2018
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biologic switching between interleukin 17A antagonists secukinumab and ixekizumab: a 12‐week, multicenter, retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports showed the efficacy of switching from secukinumab to ixekizumab only at 12 weeks . In our study, we extended follow‐up to 24 weeks, showing that ixekizumab might represent a valid and safe treatment option in patients with psoriasis who failed secukinumab.…”
Section: Demographics and Characteristics Of Secukinumab Nonrespondersupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Previous reports showed the efficacy of switching from secukinumab to ixekizumab only at 12 weeks . In our study, we extended follow‐up to 24 weeks, showing that ixekizumab might represent a valid and safe treatment option in patients with psoriasis who failed secukinumab.…”
Section: Demographics and Characteristics Of Secukinumab Nonrespondersupporting
confidence: 50%
“…In this sense, a recent study by Georgakopoulos et al . showed that a large proportion of secukinumab non‐responders (22/31; 71.0%) who switch to ixekizumab could experience an improved clinical response regardless of the reason or timing of secukinumab discontinuation . Furthermore, the authors observed that not all patients who experience an AE with secukinumab will experience the same event with ixekizumab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effectiveness was associated with good tolerability, no harmful signals derived from switching, and the occurrence of only mild AEs, such as upper respiratory tract infections occurring in 23.8% patients. Previous studies described switching to ixekizumab after secukinumab failure [13, 14], but no data about using ustekinumab in secukinumab nonresponder patients were available. This study provided evidence that ustekinumab might be considered a safe and effective therapeutic option after failure of secukinumab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secukinumab was proven effective and safe in treating psoriasis, and its efficacy was significantly greater than ustekinumab in a head-to-head randomized trial [12]. Notwithstanding the marked efficacy and the good safety profile, drug discontinuation with secukinumab has been observed but, currently, only a few reports describe switching experiences from secu­kinumab to other biologic therapies [2, 13-17]. Recent clinical reports described the efficacy and safety of switching from secukinumab to another anti-IL-17A agent, ixekizumab, but none reported clinical outcomes of switching from secukinumab to ustekinumab [13, 14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation