2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence, distribution and ecological risks of organophosphate esters and synthetic musks in sediments from the Hun River

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentrations of tri-OPEs in the present study were higher than those in river sediments from Beijiang River (48−470; median 110 ng g −1 ), 11 Xijiang River (8.3−48; median 32 ng g −1 ), 11 and the Guangzhou section of Pearl River (62−220; median 130 ng g −1 ) 11 within the Pearl River Delta, South China. Levels of tri-OPEs were also higher than those in sediments from Hun River (a tributary of the Liao River system) (3.5−46 ng g −1 ) 46 and Liao River (20−230 ng g −1 ) 47 of Northeast China. Levels of tri-OPEs in the present study were also much higher than those in oceanic sediment from the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea (0.08−4.6 ng g −1 ) 48 and from the North Pacific to the Arctic Ocean (0.16−4.7 ng g −1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Concentrations of tri-OPEs in the present study were higher than those in river sediments from Beijiang River (48−470; median 110 ng g −1 ), 11 Xijiang River (8.3−48; median 32 ng g −1 ), 11 and the Guangzhou section of Pearl River (62−220; median 130 ng g −1 ) 11 within the Pearl River Delta, South China. Levels of tri-OPEs were also higher than those in sediments from Hun River (a tributary of the Liao River system) (3.5−46 ng g −1 ) 46 and Liao River (20−230 ng g −1 ) 47 of Northeast China. Levels of tri-OPEs in the present study were also much higher than those in oceanic sediment from the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea (0.08−4.6 ng g −1 ) 48 and from the North Pacific to the Arctic Ocean (0.16−4.7 ng g −1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As a consequence, OPFRs are ubiquitously found in numerous environment matrices (atmosphere, soil, surface water, sediments, etc. ), organisms, drinking water, agricultural products, and foodstuffs. Inhalation and dermal contact of air and dust in an indoor environment are regarded as the major pathways of OPFRs exposure for humans, because building materials and indoor products (furniture, electronics, carpets, curtains, etc.) are considered to be a significant source of OPFRs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global use index of OPEs was 465,000 tons in 2006 (van der Veen & de Boer, 2012), which raised to 680,000 tons in 2015, with an increased usage rate of 7.9% annually (Zeng, Wu, et al, 2018). Reports suggested the presence of OPEs in water (Reemtsma et al, 2008), sediments (Zeng, Hu, et al, 2018), drinking water (Ding et al, 2015), indoor dust (Hoffman et al, 2015), and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent (Marklund et al, 2005; Sundkvist et al, 2010). The reason behind the presence of OPEs in the air, drinking water, and foods is that they are not covalently bound to indoor and outdoor products (Hou et al, 2021; Wang et al, 2017; Wei et al, 2015), which tend to get released in the surrounding micro-environments due to volatilization, abrasion, and leaching (Hou et al, 2021; Wei et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%