2018
DOI: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.5.481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The 2016 WHO versus 2008 WHO Criteria for the Diagnosis of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Abstract: The 2016 WHO diagnostic criteria for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) require both absolute and relative monocytosis (≥1×109/L and ≥10% of white blood cell counts) in peripheral blood. Moreover, myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) features in bone marrow and/or MPN-associated mutations tend to support MPN with monocytosis rather than CMML. We assessed the impact of the 2016 WHO criteria on CMML diagnosis, compared with the 2008 WHO criteria, through a retrospective review of the medical records of 38 CMML … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15-19 Moreover, contrasting the 2008 WHO classification, the diagnosis of CMML now requires both an absolute monocytosis (≥1×10 9 /L) and relative monocytosis (≥10% of leukocytes) in the peripheral blood (PB). 15-19 In the 2008 and 2016 update of the WHO classification, CMML can only be diagnosed per definition when rearrangements in PDGFRA , PDGFRB or FGFR1 genes have been excluded, and in the 2016 update, the PCM1-JAK2 fusion gene was added as an excluding criterion. 14-16,19 These molecular aberrations are commonly found in eosinophilia-associated neoplasms such as chronic eosinophilic leukemia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…15-19 Moreover, contrasting the 2008 WHO classification, the diagnosis of CMML now requires both an absolute monocytosis (≥1×10 9 /L) and relative monocytosis (≥10% of leukocytes) in the peripheral blood (PB). 15-19 In the 2008 and 2016 update of the WHO classification, CMML can only be diagnosed per definition when rearrangements in PDGFRA , PDGFRB or FGFR1 genes have been excluded, and in the 2016 update, the PCM1-JAK2 fusion gene was added as an excluding criterion. 14-16,19 These molecular aberrations are commonly found in eosinophilia-associated neoplasms such as chronic eosinophilic leukemia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15-19 In the 2008 and 2016 update of the WHO classification, CMML can only be diagnosed per definition when rearrangements in PDGFRA , PDGFRB or FGFR1 genes have been excluded, and in the 2016 update, the PCM1-JAK2 fusion gene was added as an excluding criterion. 14-16,19 These molecular aberrations are commonly found in eosinophilia-associated neoplasms such as chronic eosinophilic leukemia. 20,21 However, CMML is also listed as an underlying variant in these molecular ‘entities’ in the WHO classification system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exact mechanism of PO-MMLR has not been fully elucidated. Studies have shown that patients with CMML have increased concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-8, IL-10, IL-1 receptor antagonist, tumor necrosis factor α, and IL-6 compared with healthy controls [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] . We hypothesize that in our patient the increased risk of PO-MMLR was perhaps due to the presence of TET-2 mutation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Budget Plan 2, the non-statutory items with a selection rate >80%, with the exception of serum creatinine, were white blood cell count (92%), uric acid (89%), and fecal occult blood reaction (81%). White blood cell count can be used for the detection of leukemia and hematologic diseases 24) , and is also useful for the risk and aptitude assessments in pathogen-related businesses and the hospitality industry, as well as to provide health guidance to smokers with an increased white blood cell count 25) . Uric acid with poorly controlled hyperuricemia can cause gout attacks, thereby affecting work productivity by unexpected absences and pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%