2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best practices for the use of intracerebroventricular drug delivery devices

Abstract: For decades, intracerebroventricular (ICV), or intraventricular, devices have been used in the treatment of a broad range of pediatric and adult central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Due to the limited permeability of the blood brain barrier, diseases with CNS involvement may require direct administration of drugs into the brain to achieve full therapeutic effect. A recent comprehensive literature review on the clinical use and complications of ICV drug delivery revealed that device-associated complication r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the infusion of mAbs unexpectedly stopped after 7 days of ICV deliverance in one mouse (#13); surprisingly, the animal survived, suggesting that the duration of ICV infusion could be shortened in some cases, naturally taking into consideration clinical status of the patient. ICV delivery is a safe administration route that distributes compounds throughout the brain, and despite the need of accurate neurosurgical techniques and to follow best practice requirements, it is extensively used in human neurology (Cohen‐Pfeffer et al , 2017; Slavc et al , 2018; Duma et al , 2019). Notwithstanding, other routes to the CNS, such as intralumbar, should not be excluded and need to be assessed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the infusion of mAbs unexpectedly stopped after 7 days of ICV deliverance in one mouse (#13); surprisingly, the animal survived, suggesting that the duration of ICV infusion could be shortened in some cases, naturally taking into consideration clinical status of the patient. ICV delivery is a safe administration route that distributes compounds throughout the brain, and despite the need of accurate neurosurgical techniques and to follow best practice requirements, it is extensively used in human neurology (Cohen‐Pfeffer et al , 2017; Slavc et al , 2018; Duma et al , 2019). Notwithstanding, other routes to the CNS, such as intralumbar, should not be excluded and need to be assessed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional disadvantage of this administration route for CNS disorders is that delivering large amounts of virus into the An ICV injection consists of delivering the drug directly into the CSF through the lateral ventricles providing the broadest CNS distribution. Although this technique is relatively safe and effective, and is routinely undertaken by neurosurgeons [75], it is not without risks and complications including infections, intracerebral hemorrhage, subcutaneous CSF leaks and increased intracranial pressure [75][76][77][78]. However, these rare complications are most often associated with chronic delivery of biologics, and single-delivery AAV treatments will likely be safer.…”
Section: Route Of Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For application of ICV chemotherapy, strict antiseptic rules had been implemented at our hospital. 25 While no infectious complications occurred, non-infectious complications were observed in three patients (two patients with pericatheter leucencephalopathy, one patient with surgical scar dehiscence and CSF leak); however, these complications were manageable and longterm sequelae could be avoided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%