Abstract:PurposeTo report a rare case of isolated, unilateral CRAO in a young patient with mitral valve prolapse secondary to Barlow's disease.ObservationsA 29-year-old woman with history of premature ventricular contractions and cardiac ablation presented to the emergency room after sudden onset painless visual loss in her left eye (OS). Her vision was 20/20 in her right eye and hand motion in the left. Fundus exam demonstrated a central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) OS. Computerized tomography of head and neck were… Show more
“…Retinal vessels and flow normal6/9. Significant restriction with preservation of central fields.Kovach et al47, 2015VA 1/200 (previously 20/50)<12Not reportedInfusion of verapamil followed by alteplaseMMA infused – details not givenOne year later central foveal thickness reduced from 277 to 232 microns and macular volume decreased from 8.53 to 6.98 mm20/70Wilkins et al48, 2018HM10Not reportedNot reportedIAT via OA – details not givenOCT showed reduced thickness of RNFL at 1 weekHM Abbreviations: Rx, treatment; rTPA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; LMWH, low molecular weight heparin; MMA, middle meningeal artery; OA, ophthalmic artery; ECA, external carotid artery; FFA, fluorescein fundus angiography; VA, visual acuity; VF, visual fields; logMAR, logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution; HM, hand movements; CF, counting fingers; PL, light perception; NPL, nil perception of light.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Twelve case reports were included40–48 (Table 2). Four additional case reports are reported separately as these patients developed CRAO during or post-procedure (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arteritic CRAO was excluded in 6 cases41,44,45,47,48 based on reported history (arteritic symptoms excluded) and investigations (normal CRP and ESR). Embolus composition was only mentioned in 1 case41 where Hollenhurst plaques were observed and this patient achieved VA of 20/20 after IAT.…”
IntroductionCentral retinal artery occlusion is an ophthalmic emergency which typically causes acute, painless visual loss. Several conservative treatment options are practiced with little benefit. Thrombolysis as a therapeutic option has gathered interest as well as controversy. This paper aims at reviewing the relevant literature to assess the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute central retinal artery occlusion.MethodsA review of the literature was conducted. Keywords included “intra-arterial thrombolysis” or “intra-arterial fibrinolysis” in combination with “central retinal artery occlusion” or “CRAO”. A Cochrane Database search was performed for randomised control trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses using the same keywords.ResultsTwenty-eight studies were identified which included case reports, case series, case-control studies and 1 randomised control trial: the European Assessment Group for Lysis in the Eye Study. Improvement in vision was measured using different methods and at different time points. The findings of these studies generally favour an effect towards intra-arterial thrombolysis however there are many limitations. Additionally, the European Assessment Group for Lysis in the Eye Study showed lack of effect in intra-arterial thrombolysis vs conservative measures.ConclusionCurrent evidence is not sufficient to recommend intra-arterial thrombolysis due to the variability of visual improvement within retrospective studies, heterogeneity in treatment regimens between studies and adverse effects. Intra-arterial thrombolysis may have a role in patients presenting early, particularly if they have monocular vision, after discussion of the risks and benefits. Further high-quality trials assessing the clinical efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolysis may shed more light on this topic.
“…Retinal vessels and flow normal6/9. Significant restriction with preservation of central fields.Kovach et al47, 2015VA 1/200 (previously 20/50)<12Not reportedInfusion of verapamil followed by alteplaseMMA infused – details not givenOne year later central foveal thickness reduced from 277 to 232 microns and macular volume decreased from 8.53 to 6.98 mm20/70Wilkins et al48, 2018HM10Not reportedNot reportedIAT via OA – details not givenOCT showed reduced thickness of RNFL at 1 weekHM Abbreviations: Rx, treatment; rTPA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; LMWH, low molecular weight heparin; MMA, middle meningeal artery; OA, ophthalmic artery; ECA, external carotid artery; FFA, fluorescein fundus angiography; VA, visual acuity; VF, visual fields; logMAR, logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution; HM, hand movements; CF, counting fingers; PL, light perception; NPL, nil perception of light.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Twelve case reports were included40–48 (Table 2). Four additional case reports are reported separately as these patients developed CRAO during or post-procedure (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arteritic CRAO was excluded in 6 cases41,44,45,47,48 based on reported history (arteritic symptoms excluded) and investigations (normal CRP and ESR). Embolus composition was only mentioned in 1 case41 where Hollenhurst plaques were observed and this patient achieved VA of 20/20 after IAT.…”
IntroductionCentral retinal artery occlusion is an ophthalmic emergency which typically causes acute, painless visual loss. Several conservative treatment options are practiced with little benefit. Thrombolysis as a therapeutic option has gathered interest as well as controversy. This paper aims at reviewing the relevant literature to assess the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute central retinal artery occlusion.MethodsA review of the literature was conducted. Keywords included “intra-arterial thrombolysis” or “intra-arterial fibrinolysis” in combination with “central retinal artery occlusion” or “CRAO”. A Cochrane Database search was performed for randomised control trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses using the same keywords.ResultsTwenty-eight studies were identified which included case reports, case series, case-control studies and 1 randomised control trial: the European Assessment Group for Lysis in the Eye Study. Improvement in vision was measured using different methods and at different time points. The findings of these studies generally favour an effect towards intra-arterial thrombolysis however there are many limitations. Additionally, the European Assessment Group for Lysis in the Eye Study showed lack of effect in intra-arterial thrombolysis vs conservative measures.ConclusionCurrent evidence is not sufficient to recommend intra-arterial thrombolysis due to the variability of visual improvement within retrospective studies, heterogeneity in treatment regimens between studies and adverse effects. Intra-arterial thrombolysis may have a role in patients presenting early, particularly if they have monocular vision, after discussion of the risks and benefits. Further high-quality trials assessing the clinical efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolysis may shed more light on this topic.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.