2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Versus Standard Multiview Assessment of Global Longitudinal Strain for the Diagnosis of Cardiotoxicity During Cancer Therapy

Abstract: Although there was good correlation between GLS and single-view LS measurements, single-view LS measurement led to disagreement in the diagnosis of cardiotoxicity in up to 22% of patients. GLS measurements were more reproducible than single-view LS. GLS based on 3 apical views should remain the preferred technique for detection of cardiotoxicity. (Strain Surveillance for Improving Cardiovascular Outcomes During Chemotherapy [SUCCOUR]; ACTRN12614000341628).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ongoing SUCCOUR study is prospectively assessing the value of initiating cardioprotective medication triggered by the reduction of GLS vs. waiting for a decline in 3D LVEF 19 . GLS should be based on three apical (long‐axis) views and not replaced by single‐view longitudinal strain due to substantial disagreement in the diagnosis of cardiotoxicity 20 . Although less feasible and reproducible, 2D‐ or 3D‐derived global circumferential strain may also serve as additional markers of myocardial dysfunction but require more studies for validation 21,22 .…”
Section: General Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ongoing SUCCOUR study is prospectively assessing the value of initiating cardioprotective medication triggered by the reduction of GLS vs. waiting for a decline in 3D LVEF 19 . GLS should be based on three apical (long‐axis) views and not replaced by single‐view longitudinal strain due to substantial disagreement in the diagnosis of cardiotoxicity 20 . Although less feasible and reproducible, 2D‐ or 3D‐derived global circumferential strain may also serve as additional markers of myocardial dysfunction but require more studies for validation 21,22 .…”
Section: General Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age-related studies have been reported (28). Both 2DSTE and 3DSTE showed to be more sensitive to identify subtle myocardial damage compared to standard indices of LV function (29)(30)(31). Advantages and disadvantages of 3D over 2D speckle tracking have been previously discussed (16,17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The recognition of clinically significant abnormal values of ventricular strain is not easy because the index is influenced by age, sex, and loading conditions. Current guidelines on chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity suggest a cardiac assessment based on GLS cutoffs at baseline because a GLS decrease compared to the patient's baseline value is better justified than the use of an absolute cutoff (30,31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such study showed good agreement and similar prognostic value of 4ch GLS and three plane GLS in heart failure patients [ 18 ]. Another study aimed at detecting cardiotoxicity was conducted in patients undergoing chemotherapy [ 19 ]. This study also found good agreement between three plane GLS and 4ch GLS, but nuanced this by showing some discordance regarding threshold values of cardiotoxicity for these two models in addition to lower reproducibility for 4ch GLS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%