Abstract:In the fight against Glioblastoma Multiforme, recent literature data have highlighted that integrin α5β1 and p53 are part of convergent pathways in the control of glioma apoptosis. This observation prompted us to seek a molecule able to simultaneously modulate both target families. Analyzing the results of a previous virtual screening against murine double minute 2 protein (MDM2), we envisaged that Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD)-mimetic molecules could be inhibitors of MDM2/4. Herein, we present the discovery of compound 7… Show more
“…It seems plausible that the inhibition of a single integrin may not suppress the complete adhesive cell function in a cell that expresses a pattern of different integrins. Apart from dual and multi-integrin inhibitors, the combination of integrin antagonists with other drugs with anti-tumor activity such as chemotherapeutics are being evaluated [142, 148]. An integrin inhibitor could intensify and reinforce the anti-tumor effect of an oncologic treatment, rather than be used as a single-agent.…”
Section: Integrins As Therapeutic Targetsmentioning
Formation of distant metastases is by far the most common cause of cancer-related deaths. The process of metastasis formation is complex, and within this complex process the formation of migratory cells, the so called epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), which enables cancer cells to break loose from the primary tumor mass and to enter the bloodstream, is of particular importance. To break loose from the primary cancer, cancer cells have to down-regulate the cell-to-cell adhesion molecuIes (CAMs) which keep them attached to neighboring cancer cells. In contrast to this downregulation of CAMS in the primary tumor, cancer cells up-regulate other types of CAMs, that enable them to attach to the endothelium in the organ of the future metastasis. During EMT, the expression of cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix adhesion molecules and their down- and upregulation is therefore critical for metastasis formation. Tumor cells mimic leukocytes to enable transmigration of the endothelial barrier at the metastatic site. The attachment of leukocytes/cancer cells to the endothelium are mediated by several CAMs different from those at the site of the primary tumor. These CAMs and their ligands are organized in a sequential row, the leukocyte adhesion cascade. In this adhesion process, integrins and their ligands are centrally involved in the molecular interactions governing the transmigration. This review discusses the integrin expression patterns found on primary tumor cells and studies whether their expression correlates with tumor progression, metastatic capacity and prognosis. Simultaneously, further possible, but so far unclearly characterized, alternative adhesion molecules and/or ligands, will be considered and emerging therapeutic possibilities reviewed.
“…It seems plausible that the inhibition of a single integrin may not suppress the complete adhesive cell function in a cell that expresses a pattern of different integrins. Apart from dual and multi-integrin inhibitors, the combination of integrin antagonists with other drugs with anti-tumor activity such as chemotherapeutics are being evaluated [142, 148]. An integrin inhibitor could intensify and reinforce the anti-tumor effect of an oncologic treatment, rather than be used as a single-agent.…”
Section: Integrins As Therapeutic Targetsmentioning
Formation of distant metastases is by far the most common cause of cancer-related deaths. The process of metastasis formation is complex, and within this complex process the formation of migratory cells, the so called epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), which enables cancer cells to break loose from the primary tumor mass and to enter the bloodstream, is of particular importance. To break loose from the primary cancer, cancer cells have to down-regulate the cell-to-cell adhesion molecuIes (CAMs) which keep them attached to neighboring cancer cells. In contrast to this downregulation of CAMS in the primary tumor, cancer cells up-regulate other types of CAMs, that enable them to attach to the endothelium in the organ of the future metastasis. During EMT, the expression of cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix adhesion molecules and their down- and upregulation is therefore critical for metastasis formation. Tumor cells mimic leukocytes to enable transmigration of the endothelial barrier at the metastatic site. The attachment of leukocytes/cancer cells to the endothelium are mediated by several CAMs different from those at the site of the primary tumor. These CAMs and their ligands are organized in a sequential row, the leukocyte adhesion cascade. In this adhesion process, integrins and their ligands are centrally involved in the molecular interactions governing the transmigration. This review discusses the integrin expression patterns found on primary tumor cells and studies whether their expression correlates with tumor progression, metastatic capacity and prognosis. Simultaneously, further possible, but so far unclearly characterized, alternative adhesion molecules and/or ligands, will be considered and emerging therapeutic possibilities reviewed.
“…MDM2based multi-target inhibitors could improve the efficacy and reduce the side effects (de Lera and Ganesan, 2016). Dual inhibitors that have been reported to be co-inhibit with MDM2 include MDM4, NF-kB, histone deacetylases (HDAC), translocator protein (TSPO), XIAP, and integrins (McCormack et al, 2012;Daniele et al, 2016;Gu et al, 2016;Shirai et al, 2016;Giustiniano et al, 2017;Merlino et al, 2018), which achieved excellent in vitro and in vivo antitumor potency. Considering MDM2 and MDM4 dual inhibitors had been well reviewed in the recent literature (Teveroni et al, 2016;Espadinha et al, 2018), we summarize other dual inhibitors.…”
“…An effective a5b1/avb3 integrin binding agent was identified to inhibit MDM2/4 activity and reactivated p53 pathway. In addition, this compound can induce cell cycle arrest, reduce the invasiveness of GBM cells and block the proliferation of p53 wild-type GBM cells (Merlino et al, 2018). The novel class of integrin/MDM2 inhibitors is useful in the subpopulation of patients with glioblastoma expressing functional p53 concomitantly with a high level of a5b1 integrin (Merlino et al, 2018).…”
Section: Dual Inhibitors Of Mdm2 and Integrinsmentioning
Defects in DNA damage repair may cause genome instability and cancer development. The tumor suppressor gene p53 regulates cell cycle arrest to allow time for DNA repair. The oncoprotein mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) promotes cell survival, proliferation, invasion, and therapeutic resistance in many types of cancer. The major role of MDM2 is to inhibit p53 activity and promote its degradation. In this review, we describe the influence of MDM2 on genomic instability, the role of MDM2 on releasing p53 and binding DNA repair proteins to inhibit repair, and the regulation network of MDM2 including its transcriptional modifications, protein stability, and localization following DNA damage in genome integrity maintenance and in MDM2-p53 axis control. We also discuss p53-dependent and p53 independent oncogenic function of MDM2 and the outcomes of clinical trials that have been used with clinical inhibitors targeting p53-MDM2 to treat certain cancers.
“…This, in turn, could be achieved by reactivating endogenous differentiation programs in cancer cells to resume the maturation process and eliminate tumor phenotypes. In this regard, recent reports have highlighted the importance of p53 tumor suppressor in controlling stem cell fate and glioma cell proliferation and invasiveness (Qin et al, 2007; Molchadsky et al, 2010; Zhao and Xu, 2010; Li et al, 2013; Merlino et al, 2018). The first indication that p53 could inhibit neural stem cells (NSCs) self-renewal was observed in p53 knockout mice, in which increased levels of cell self-renewal were detected in the neurogenic niches, when compared with wild-type animals (Meletis et al, 2006).…”
Brain tumor, as any type of cancer, is assumed to be sustained by a small subpopulation of stem-like cells with distinctive properties that allow them to survive conventional therapies and drive tumor recurrence. Thus, the identification of new molecules capable of controlling stemness properties may be key in developing effective therapeutic strategies for cancer by inducing stem-like cells differentiation. Spiropyrazoline oxindoles have previously been shown to induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, as well as upregulate p53 steady-state levels, while decreasing its main inhibitor MDM2 in the HCT116 human colorectal carcinoma cell line. In this study, we made modifications in this scaffold by including combinations of different substituents in the pyrazoline ring in order to obtain novel small molecules that could modulate p53 activity and act as differentiation inducer agents. The antiproliferative activity of the synthesized compounds was assessed using the isogenic pair of HCT116 cell lines differing in the presence or absence of the p53 gene. Among the tested spirooxindoles, spiropyrazoline oxindole 1a was selective against the cancer cell line expressing wild-type p53 and presented low cytotoxicity. This small molecule induced neural stem cell (NSC) differentiation through reduced SOX2 (marker of multipotency) and increased βIII-tubulin (marker of neural differentiation) which suggests a great potential as a non-toxic inducer of cell differentiation. More importantly, in glioma cancer cells (GL-261), compound 1a reduced stemness, by decreasing SOX2 protein levels, while also promoting chemotherapy sensitization. These results highlight the potential of p53 modulators for brain cell differentiation, with spirooxindole 1a representing a promising lead molecule for the development of new brain antitumor drugs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.