2018
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a third male type in a male‐dimorphic model species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be emphasized however, that this study does not provide evidence that all scramblers are female mimics, as the model that best describes the data did not differentiate between male ARTs. Nevertheless, the results of this study do warrant further exploration of a female mimic or "sneaking" strategy in bulb mites, particularly because 'megascramblers'-which sometimes elicit mating behavior from other males-are suggested to be a third ART [47]. Indeed, these mega-scramblers may be the result of sexual selection driving larger scramblers to chemically and physically resemble females.…”
Section: Intersexual and Intrasexual Differences In Pheromone Productionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be emphasized however, that this study does not provide evidence that all scramblers are female mimics, as the model that best describes the data did not differentiate between male ARTs. Nevertheless, the results of this study do warrant further exploration of a female mimic or "sneaking" strategy in bulb mites, particularly because 'megascramblers'-which sometimes elicit mating behavior from other males-are suggested to be a third ART [47]. Indeed, these mega-scramblers may be the result of sexual selection driving larger scramblers to chemically and physically resemble females.…”
Section: Intersexual and Intrasexual Differences In Pheromone Productionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Importantly, ART expression in R. robini does not depend on population density, unlike in its sister species R. echinopus [41], nor on ART frequency [42]. Upon maturity, male R. robini develop into one of two distinct morphs (see Figure 1): (1) juvenile males that are relatively large mostly mature as "fighters", which possess a thickened third leg pair with a sharp end that can be used to kill conspecifics [45,46], and (2) juvenile males that are relatively small mostly mature as "scramblers", which lack the weaponized leg pair (although a rare third morph, the megascrambler, has recently been suggested; [47]). Although scrambler expression is regulated by a (partially) genetically determined threshold for body size [17; 48; 49], gene-by-environment interactions also play a key role [50], with diet quality and quantity thought to be the primary drivers of body size and therefore ART expression [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a third male morph termed the mega-scrambler has been identified in R. robini (Stewart, van den Beuken, Rhebergen, Deere, & Smallegange, 2018). Systems comprising three ARTs are not uncommon (Rowland & Emlen, 2009;Shuster & Sassaman, 1997;Sinervo & Lively, 1996), which raises the question of how the model could be extended to address three-ART systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is well established that the alternative morphs in R. robini are associated with variation in body size, and thus represent a discontinuous allometric scaling relationship (Smallegange, 2011; Leigh & Smallegange, 2014; Smallegange & Deere, 2014), the correlation is noisy. A large range of overlap in body size exists between juveniles developing as fighters and juveniles developing as scramblers (Smallegange, 2011; Stewart et al ., 2018). We hypothesize that these observations are, at least partly, explained by food-dependent plasticity in how body size scales with male morph expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%