2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-018-0649-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased Functional MEG Connectivity as a Hallmark of MRI-Negative Focal and Generalized Epilepsy

Abstract: Epilepsy is one of the most prevalent neurological diseases with a high morbidity. Accumulating evidence has shown that epilepsy is an archetypical neural network disorder. Here we developed a non-invasive cortical functional connectivity analysis based on magnetoencephalography (MEG) to assess commonalities and differences in the network phenotype in different epilepsy syndromes (non-lesional/cryptogenic focal and idiopathic/genetic generalized epilepsy). Thirty-seven epilepsy patients with normal structural … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other studies, the intraindividual and even interindividual comparisons of functional connectivity assessment with PLI had similar amplitudes (Douw et al, 2010;Geraedts et al, 2018;Stam et al, 2009;Wang and Meng, 2016). A small difference is explained in part by numerous cofactors that influence interictal functional connectivity such as age (Smit et al, 2012(Smit et al, , 2016, cognitive and psychiatric coexisting conditions (Yoo et al, 2018), epilepsy types (Li Hegner et al, 2018) and treatments (Clemens et al, 2014;Haneef et al, 2015). Furthermore, the decrease in functional connectivity between ON and OFF periods does not need to be high to be relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In other studies, the intraindividual and even interindividual comparisons of functional connectivity assessment with PLI had similar amplitudes (Douw et al, 2010;Geraedts et al, 2018;Stam et al, 2009;Wang and Meng, 2016). A small difference is explained in part by numerous cofactors that influence interictal functional connectivity such as age (Smit et al, 2012(Smit et al, , 2016, cognitive and psychiatric coexisting conditions (Yoo et al, 2018), epilepsy types (Li Hegner et al, 2018) and treatments (Clemens et al, 2014;Haneef et al, 2015). Furthermore, the decrease in functional connectivity between ON and OFF periods does not need to be high to be relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Various contradictory findings were reported, such as globally increased/decreased connectivity (Pereira et al, 2010;Pittau et al, 2012;Wirsich et al, 2016), or concomitantly increased and decreased connectivity in neighboring networks (Bettus et al, 2009(Bettus et al, , 2010Liao et al, 2010;Su et al, 2015). In contrast, most RS-FC studies using magnetoencephalographic (MEG) and electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings indicate predominantly increased connectivity between the regions found to be less connected in fMRI (Bettus et al, 2008;Bartolomei et al, 2013a,b;Schevon et al, 2007;Lagarde et al, 2018;Li Hegner et al, 2018). These discrepancies could be attributed to the different functional aspects captured by each modality or the different RS-FC estimates applied (Ridley et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epilepsy is commonly considered an archetypical network disease (1), with seizures and interictal activity generated and spreading in networks involving one or both hemispheres. There is a growing body of imaging evidence suggesting that epilepsy affects both structural (2, 3) and functional brain network properties (47). Interestingly, even in idiopathic/genetic generalized epilepsy, there is a certain level of focality both in resting-state imaging (7) as well as for generators of epileptiform activity (8) and seizures (9, 10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%