2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Atrial Fibrillation–Specific Symptoms Before and 2 Years After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Abstract: Patient-reported and physician-assessed outcomes were both useful in assessing symptom relief after AF ablation, although patient-reported outcomes were more sensitive tools. There was also a discrepancy between patient-reported and physician-assessed outcomes after ablation. Freedom from AF and a low AF burden most often resulted in a reduction of symptoms, but symptom relief also occurred despite little effect on the arrhythmia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 8 , 9 , 16 The wide range can be explained due to varying AF definitions, observing intervals and efforts for AF diagnosis, and may include a temporal effect related to improved ablation techniques like pressure sensitive and irrigated ablation catheters or second-generation cryoballoon in our cohort. The improvement in AF-related symptoms in our cohort for patients with recurrence of AF is in line with previous reported improvement of symptoms 17 and quality of life. 18 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“… 8 , 9 , 16 The wide range can be explained due to varying AF definitions, observing intervals and efforts for AF diagnosis, and may include a temporal effect related to improved ablation techniques like pressure sensitive and irrigated ablation catheters or second-generation cryoballoon in our cohort. The improvement in AF-related symptoms in our cohort for patients with recurrence of AF is in line with previous reported improvement of symptoms 17 and quality of life. 18 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…35 However, the EHRA symptom score is physician-assessed, reflecting how physicians weigh the symptoms of their AF patients rather than the patients' perception that may differ substantially. 36 In addition, the EHRA score cannot precisely differentiate between AF-related and concomitant comorbidity-related symptoms. Indeed, in symptomatic patients with underlying comorbidities, optimal management of concomitant diseases is necessary before proceeding with a symptomguided treatment decision for left atrial ablation, and the descriptor(s) of the symptom severity domain may change in the future to include the assessment of quality of life, patient-perceived burden of treatment, 37 and other features.…”
Section: The 4s-af Scheme Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The episodes of palpitations documented by the participants may not have been caused by AF. The correlation between symptoms of AF and an actual arrhythmia is low 47 and it would thus have been useful to have recorded the ECG during symptoms.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%