2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The hippocampus and related neocortical structures in memory transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

33
262
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(319 citation statements)
references
References 162 publications
33
262
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An updated version of the Trace Transformation Theory (TTT) suggests that both the memory details and gist mediated by the pHPC and aHPC, respectively, and schemas mediated by mPFC can all coexist and interact dynamically (Sekeres, Winocur, & Moscovitch, ). The memory from detail‐rich representations to gist‐like or schematic representations is accompanied by corresponding neural representations along the long axis of the hippocampus (Robin & Moscovitch, ; Sekeres et al, ). In sum, our results confirm the important role of hippocampal–neocortical interactions in the dynamics of schematic memory representation (Wang & Morris, ) and provide empirical evidence for the recent TTT (Sekeres et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An updated version of the Trace Transformation Theory (TTT) suggests that both the memory details and gist mediated by the pHPC and aHPC, respectively, and schemas mediated by mPFC can all coexist and interact dynamically (Sekeres, Winocur, & Moscovitch, ). The memory from detail‐rich representations to gist‐like or schematic representations is accompanied by corresponding neural representations along the long axis of the hippocampus (Robin & Moscovitch, ; Sekeres et al, ). In sum, our results confirm the important role of hippocampal–neocortical interactions in the dynamics of schematic memory representation (Wang & Morris, ) and provide empirical evidence for the recent TTT (Sekeres et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our behavioral results also showed that the schema effect was modulated by retention interval, with a greater schema effect after a 1‐day interval. Further studies are necessary to investigate how the hippocampus and vmPFC activations, as well as their interactions, change over time by including both recent and remote delays (Sekeres et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are consistent with reports of functional specialization along the long‐axis of the hippocampus, and its mPFC projections. Anterior hippocampus codes global representations related to the central elements of an event (Poppenk, Evensmoen, Moscovitch, & Nadel, ; Poppenk & Moscovitch, ; Robin & Moscovitch, ; Sekeres, Winocur, & Moscovitch, ). Accordingly, persistent activity in the anterior hippocampus during 7 days retrieval can account for both the increase in mPFC activity, and retrieval of the more schematic version of the memory (Ghosh, Moscovitch, Colella, & Gilboa, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At shorter timescales, recent event‐specific information may be less accessible due to an intervening context shift (DuBrow & Davachi, ; Swallow et al, ). At longer timescales, the details of more remote episodic memories may become less accessible due to time‐dependent memory decay and/or the transformation of those events into more generalized (less detailed) schema representations (Sekeres, Winocur, & Moscovitch, ; Winocur & Moscovitch, ). Thus, more effortful retrieval processes that engage the hippocampus and LPFC may be important when it is desirable to link past occurrences to the present situation.…”
Section: Retroactive Mechanisms Of Binding Sequential Memory Represenmentioning
confidence: 99%