2018
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value-based Surgical Care: Evidence for the Enigma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A ccurate performance assessment is crucial for the improvement of surgical care, [1][2][3][4][5] and only quality indicators that are both clinically relevant and easy to understand may gain wide acceptance. 2 Traditional indicators of surgical quality are usually derived from averaged outcomes of largely unselected patient cohorts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A ccurate performance assessment is crucial for the improvement of surgical care, [1][2][3][4][5] and only quality indicators that are both clinically relevant and easy to understand may gain wide acceptance. 2 Traditional indicators of surgical quality are usually derived from averaged outcomes of largely unselected patient cohorts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of benchmarking is the improvement of quality, and this idea is also applied in the field of surgery. The key to quality improvement is accurate assessment 1 , 2 , 48 , 49 , 55 . Traditional outcome measures of surgical quality usually focus on averaged results of unselected population cohorts 1 , 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%