2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3655-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary on “Sexual function after robot-assisted prolapse surgery: a prospective study”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most previous studies did not report preoperative dyspareunia rates, making it difficult to distinguish between persisting and de novo dyspareunia [11] . Furthermore, sexual function is often under-reported [12] or reported as a secondary outcome [7] , and follow-up for most studies has been short [10] , [11] , [13] , [14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous studies did not report preoperative dyspareunia rates, making it difficult to distinguish between persisting and de novo dyspareunia [11] . Furthermore, sexual function is often under-reported [12] or reported as a secondary outcome [7] , and follow-up for most studies has been short [10] , [11] , [13] , [14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%