2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análisis de las cesáreas en Uruguay por tipo de centro hospitalario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
1
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This same group had a significantly lower cesarean section rate (29.5%) in establishments in the metropolitan regions. In Uruguay, 18 no significant differences were found in cesarean section rates in group 1 between the countryside region (24.8%) and capital (22.7%), and these rates were similar to the rates found in this study in the metropolitan region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This same group had a significantly lower cesarean section rate (29.5%) in establishments in the metropolitan regions. In Uruguay, 18 no significant differences were found in cesarean section rates in group 1 between the countryside region (24.8%) and capital (22.7%), and these rates were similar to the rates found in this study in the metropolitan region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A nivel mundial la situación no es mucho más alentadora, comparando con los datos de Uruguay el porcentaje de cesáreas fue de un 46.3% en 2014, siendo más alto en Epriv 9,10 . En India entre los años 2005 y 2016 el porcentaje de cesáreas en Epriv aumentó del 27.9 al 40.9%, mientras que en los Epub disminuyó del 15.2 al 11.9% 11 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…In Uruguay there has been a progressive increase in the CS rate, with gures going from 35.5% (2009) to 46.3% (2014), although percentages differ between regions and institutions (18,19). In view of this increase, in 2017 the Uruguayan Ministry of Health developed the main guidelines for a strategy aimed at reducing preventable CS, based on Robson categories 1, 2, 3 and 4, considered the lowest risk groups (20,21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%