2018
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1704543115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomaterial surface energy-driven ligand assembly strongly regulates stem cell mechanosensitivity and fate on very soft substrates

Abstract: SignificanceCell instructive biomaterial cues are a major topic of interest in both basic and applied research. In this work, we clarify how surface energy of soft biomaterials can dramatically affect mesenchymal stem cell receptor recruitment and downstream signaling related to cell fate. We elucidate how surface protein self-assembly and the resulting surface topology can act to steer mechanotransduction and related biological response of attached cells. These findings fill a critical gap in our basic unders… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of cell behaviors on soft substrates have employed 2D systems coated with ECM components, which can act as adhesive anchors . Surface energy and phosphatidylinositol‐mediated signals have been demonstrated to promote cell spreading and focal adhesion on 2D soft substrates . Yet it remains largely unknown what the effect of dynamic cues on stem‐cell spheroids fate is within 3D soft microniches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies of cell behaviors on soft substrates have employed 2D systems coated with ECM components, which can act as adhesive anchors . Surface energy and phosphatidylinositol‐mediated signals have been demonstrated to promote cell spreading and focal adhesion on 2D soft substrates . Yet it remains largely unknown what the effect of dynamic cues on stem‐cell spheroids fate is within 3D soft microniches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The mechanical interactions between the ECM–cell and cell–cell junctions play a key role in transmitting forces to cells in in vivo microenvironment, which can further regulate intracellular signaling pathways . At the cellular scale, the pericellular response can be viscoelastic, roughness, or surface energy as well as stiffness . Most of the known cues on cell physiology have been almost exclusively using static biomaterials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, primary human MSCs that grow on stiff silicone substrates doped with poly (dimethylsiloxane-ethylene oxide) (PEO) surfactant and have a θ value in the same range (60°), display a tendency of osteogenic differentiation (Razafiarison et al, 2016). Although the regulatory mechanism is not fully understood, a plausible explanation is the hydrophobicity-driven exposure of cell binding sites in the deposited extracellular matrix (ECM), collagen I in this case, which in turn directs the expression of focal adhesion components (Razafiarison et al, 2018).…”
Section: Wettabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been verified that MSCs cultured on soft substrates expressed more chondrogenic marker and adipogenic marker, compared to MSCs grown on stiff substrates, [ 32 ] which may be due to the surface energy‐driven supramolecular ligands of MSCs regulating cell fate by sensing of substrate mechanical compliance. [ 33 ] The strong multidifferentiation capability of hADSCs indicated that GelMA MS is an excellent vehicle for expansion of MSCs, preserving the basic properties of cells.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%