The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.ra118.000648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Control Analysis in Real-time (QC-ART): A Tool for Real-time Quality Control Assessment of Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomics Data

Abstract: Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based proteomics studies of large sample cohorts can easily require from months to years to complete. Acquiring consistent, high-quality data in such large-scale studies is challenging because of normal variations in instrumentation performance over time, as well as artifacts introduced by the samples themselves, such as those because of collection, storage and processing. Existing quality control methods for proteomics data primarily focus on post-hoc analysis t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See Supplementary Table S1 for demographic, serology, OGTT, and other information/parameters. Samples from all subjects were divided into four equal aliquots that were individually subjected to proteomics, metabolomics, lipidomics, and transcriptomics (miRNAs) analyses (i.e., parallel quadra-omics) that were performed in collaboration with the Miami Integrative Metabolomics Research Center (lipidomics) [ 58 ], Pacific Northwest National Laboratories (proteomics) [ 59 ], Ocean Ridge Biosciences (transcriptomics) [ 60 ], and the Stedman Metabolomics Laboratory at Duke University Medical Center (metabolomics) [ 61 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Supplementary Table S1 for demographic, serology, OGTT, and other information/parameters. Samples from all subjects were divided into four equal aliquots that were individually subjected to proteomics, metabolomics, lipidomics, and transcriptomics (miRNAs) analyses (i.e., parallel quadra-omics) that were performed in collaboration with the Miami Integrative Metabolomics Research Center (lipidomics) [ 58 ], Pacific Northwest National Laboratories (proteomics) [ 59 ], Ocean Ridge Biosciences (transcriptomics) [ 60 ], and the Stedman Metabolomics Laboratory at Duke University Medical Center (metabolomics) [ 61 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In every step of a data analysis procedure, it is advisable to identify outliers (Bittremieux, Meysman, Martens, Valkenborg, & Laukens, 2016;Kauffmann & Huber, 2010;Norton, Vaquero-Garcia, Lahens, Grant, & Barash, 2018;Stanfill et al, 2018), including samples or features with an abnormal number of missing values, samples that display substantially different distributions in their quantitative features, or samples that do not cluster with the rest of their group. Such cases need to be handled carefully; if the outlying nature of a sample cannot be corrected (through appropriate missing data imputation and data normalization, or after correction of mis-annotated samples), the offending sample might be better removed completely for the subsequent data analysis.…”
Section: Data Cleaning and Normalization For Molecular Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For experiments that contain many samples, and where the time between data acquisition and data analysis is long, this QC/QA step should not be delayed; rather QC/QA should happen immediately upon data acquisition to give feedback as soon as possible to the instrument operator 28 . To fill this need in targeted proteomics studies, we created Q4SRM which can analyze the heavy labeled reference peptides in an LC-SRM-MS data file within one minute.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%