2018
DOI: 10.1111/hae.13468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of haemophilia carriers in moderate and severe haemophilia A and B: Prevalence and determinants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides haemophilia, all families with inherited BDs should be offered easy HTC access. Every patient contact provides an opportunity to identify affected family members (PoC 2), and provide access to haemostatic testing, comprehensive care and genetic counselling for family members 47 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides haemophilia, all families with inherited BDs should be offered easy HTC access. Every patient contact provides an opportunity to identify affected family members (PoC 2), and provide access to haemostatic testing, comprehensive care and genetic counselling for family members 47 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies already reported significant details about carriers' reproductive choices in haemophilia and other hereditary disorders (avoidance of pregnancy or choice for PD and attitude to VTP in women who experienced complications of haemophilia), but they were primarily based on data collected with questionnaires or indirectly accrued from patients' histories. 13,14 A recent systematic review provided an exhaustive overview of all published articles on attitudes and experience of haemophilia carriers concerning pregnancy and reproductive options, showing the impact of quality of life of family PWH in decisionmaking, the importance of genetic counselling and the role of prenatal diagnosis, helpful but psychologically challenging; however, the authors underlined the need for studies that report 'real-life' experience about these topics. 15 The high number of cases is the main strength of the present study, which involves almost all severe PWH and suspected carri-ers referred to the regional haemophilia centres, who all underwent genetic counselling and molecular screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple papers have described outcomes among patients who switched to rFIXFc prophylaxis, with very consistent findings in clinical trials and in real‐world clinical settings (Table S2). 11,42–56 Typically, patients switching to rFIXFc prophylaxis experience reductions in injection frequency: the most common post‐switch rFIXFc dose interval is 7 days, but intervals of 10 or 14 days are also seen 11,42,43,45,46,49–51,53–56 . Factor consumption is also reduced after switching, generally by 26%–50%, to around 40–60 IU/kg/week 11,42,43,45,46,49–54,56 .…”
Section: Rfixfc In Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“… 11,42–56 Typically, patients switching to rFIXFc prophylaxis experience reductions in injection frequency: the most common post‐switch rFIXFc dose interval is 7 days, but intervals of 10 or 14 days are also seen 11,42,43,45,46,49–51,53–56 . Factor consumption is also reduced after switching, generally by 26%–50%, to around 40–60 IU/kg/week 11,42,43,45,46,49–54,56 . Despite longer dose intervals and lower weekly factor use, patients switching from prophylaxis with other products to prophylaxis with rFIXFc show stable or improved bleed protection 11,42,43,45,46,49–56 .…”
Section: Rfixfc In Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%