2018
DOI: 10.1161/circep.118.006413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response by Zghaib et al to Letter Regarding Article, “Standard Ablation Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Ablation in the Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, a number of observational studies have shown how peri-procedural CMR imaging may allow targeting the arrhythmogenic substrate of VAs, possibly improving ablation success and ultimately reducing mortality ( 35 , 36 ).…”
Section: Ventricular Arrhythmiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, a number of observational studies have shown how peri-procedural CMR imaging may allow targeting the arrhythmogenic substrate of VAs, possibly improving ablation success and ultimately reducing mortality ( 35 , 36 ).…”
Section: Ventricular Arrhythmiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area of necrosis identified by CMR correlates well with areas of low voltage revealed by EAM ( 6 , 37 39 ). Hence, the three-dimensional (3D) integration of these two techniques seems instrumental for a better identification of the anatomical substrates on where to concentrate ablations ( 35 , 36 ).…”
Section: Ventricular Arrhythmiasmentioning
confidence: 99%