2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaa.2017.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of buprenorphine, butorphanol or tramadol premedication on anaesthetic induction with alfaxalone in common marmosets ( Callithrix jacchus )

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decreased RR values (32–41 bpm) were similar to the reported RR in conscious marmosets at rest (36–44 bpm) (Horii et al, 2002) regardless of the propofol concentration, which suggested that respiratory depression was not profound when propofol was administered with the dose and infusion rate used in this study. RR values were also similar to these in other study using alfaxalone combinations (Bakker et al, 2018, 2013). Apnoea was not observed and SpO 2 was above 95% at most of the time points in Study 2, which indicated that the respiratory depressive effect of propofol was not profound.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The decreased RR values (32–41 bpm) were similar to the reported RR in conscious marmosets at rest (36–44 bpm) (Horii et al, 2002) regardless of the propofol concentration, which suggested that respiratory depression was not profound when propofol was administered with the dose and infusion rate used in this study. RR values were also similar to these in other study using alfaxalone combinations (Bakker et al, 2018, 2013). Apnoea was not observed and SpO 2 was above 95% at most of the time points in Study 2, which indicated that the respiratory depressive effect of propofol was not profound.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…HR (224–293 bpm) during time period that marmosets were immobilized in Study 2 were not very different from that in conscious marmosets at rest (200–250 bpm) or in sleeping marmosets (around 150 bpm) according to a previous study using telemetry (Schnell & Wood 1993) regardless of propofol concentration. HR values were also similar to these in other study using alfaxalone combinations (Bakker et al, 2018, 2013). It suggests that the depressive effect of propofol on HR is little when propofol is administrated at the dose and infusion rate used in this study; however, measuring other cardiovascular parameters such as arterial blood pressure, stroke volume and cardiac output are desirable in evaluating the cardiovascular effect of propofol accurately.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 70 Similar effects have been observed when using propofol in marmosets, 49 with the effects of either agent being dose dependent. With isoflurane having only limited analgesic effects, additional analgesic medications (eg, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as meloxicam or opioids such as buprenorphine) 68 may be needed, especially if stereotactic devices with ear bars are used. Coating the tips of the ear bars with topical analgesics such as xylocaine jelly is also recommended.…”
Section: Mri Under Anesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common marmosets ( Callithrix jacchus ) are increasingly used in biomedical research, 1 particularly since the successful generation of transgenic marmosets 2 . While they are often anaesthetised for various procedures, published information on marmoset anaesthesia and analgesia is limited 3‐7 . Inhalation anaesthetics are preferred for both shorter and longer procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%