Abstract:In clinical trials of two rifamycin antibiotics (rifampin and rifapentine) for treating tuberculosis (TB), patients with cavitary lung lesions did not appear to derive benefit from rifapentine. Rifapentine was found not to outperform rifampin, despite a lower minimum inhibitory concentration against in mouse models of TB. To understand these findings, we have developed a rabbit model of TB that reliably develops lung cavities with features similar to those of patients with pulmonary cavitary TB. After single o… Show more
“… 41 – 43 In addition, the rabbit is the elected model for pharmacokinetic studies due its strong correlation with clinical trials. 44 For instance, the rabbit ear scar model was successfully used prior to a Phase I randomized clinical trial for safety and tolerability of topically delivered kynurenic acid in humans and randomized controlled trials. 45 Thus, the rASC fast proliferation consists of an advantageous characteristic, promoting vast MSC availability for both in vitro and in vivo applications with a great translation described to human clinical medicine.…”
IntroductionOwing to their similarity with humans, rabbits are useful for multiple applications in biotechnology and translational research from basic to preclinical studies. In this sense, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are known for their therapeutic potential and promising future in regenerative medicine. As many studies have been using rabbit adipose-derived MSCs (ASCs) as a model of human ASCs (hASCs), it is fundamental to compare their characteristics and understand how distinct features could affect the translation to human medicine.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to comparatively characterize rabbit ASCs (rASCs) and hASCs to further uses in biotechnology and translational studies.Materials and methodsrASCs and hASCs were isolated and characterized by their immunophenotype, differentiation potential, proliferative profile, and nuclear stability in vitro.Results and discussionBoth ASCs presented differentiation potential to osteocytes, chondrocytes, and adipocytes and shared similar immunophenotype expression to CD105+, CD34−, and CD45−, but rabbit cells expressed significantly lower CD73 and CD90 than human cells. In addition, rASCs presented greater clonogenic potential and proliferation rate than hASCs but no difference in nuclear alterations.ConclusionThe distinct features of rASCs and hASCs can positively or negatively affect their use for different applications in biotechnology (such as cell reprogramming) and translational studies (such as cell transplantation, tissue engineering, and pharmacokinetics). Nevertheless, the particularities between rabbit and human MSCs should not prevent rabbit use in preclinical models, but care should be taken to interpret results and properly translate animal findings to medicine.
“… 41 – 43 In addition, the rabbit is the elected model for pharmacokinetic studies due its strong correlation with clinical trials. 44 For instance, the rabbit ear scar model was successfully used prior to a Phase I randomized clinical trial for safety and tolerability of topically delivered kynurenic acid in humans and randomized controlled trials. 45 Thus, the rASC fast proliferation consists of an advantageous characteristic, promoting vast MSC availability for both in vitro and in vivo applications with a great translation described to human clinical medicine.…”
IntroductionOwing to their similarity with humans, rabbits are useful for multiple applications in biotechnology and translational research from basic to preclinical studies. In this sense, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are known for their therapeutic potential and promising future in regenerative medicine. As many studies have been using rabbit adipose-derived MSCs (ASCs) as a model of human ASCs (hASCs), it is fundamental to compare their characteristics and understand how distinct features could affect the translation to human medicine.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to comparatively characterize rabbit ASCs (rASCs) and hASCs to further uses in biotechnology and translational studies.Materials and methodsrASCs and hASCs were isolated and characterized by their immunophenotype, differentiation potential, proliferative profile, and nuclear stability in vitro.Results and discussionBoth ASCs presented differentiation potential to osteocytes, chondrocytes, and adipocytes and shared similar immunophenotype expression to CD105+, CD34−, and CD45−, but rabbit cells expressed significantly lower CD73 and CD90 than human cells. In addition, rASCs presented greater clonogenic potential and proliferation rate than hASCs but no difference in nuclear alterations.ConclusionThe distinct features of rASCs and hASCs can positively or negatively affect their use for different applications in biotechnology (such as cell reprogramming) and translational studies (such as cell transplantation, tissue engineering, and pharmacokinetics). Nevertheless, the particularities between rabbit and human MSCs should not prevent rabbit use in preclinical models, but care should be taken to interpret results and properly translate animal findings to medicine.
“…This hypothesis was further supported by studies demonstrating that clofazimine diffuses relatively poorly into caseous necrotic lesions in humans TB (27), does not have bactericidal activity in ex vivo caseum from M. tuberculosis -infected rabbits (41), and the long-standing observation that clofazimine accumulates in macrophages (26, 27, 42, 43). Rifapentine has been shown to diffuse into necrotic caseous lesions less rapidly than rifampin in a rabbit model of cavitary TB (28), a finding that correlates with clinical data indicating that replacing rifampin with rifapentine added proportionally less activity in patients with cavitary versus non-cavitary TB disease (44). It has also been reported that rifapentine accumulates in macrophages and is relatively more active against intracellular than extracellular M. tuberculosis (25).…”
High-dose rifapentine and clofazimine have each separately been associated with treatment-shortening activity when incorporated into tuberculosis (TB) treatment regimens. We hypothesized that both modifications, i.e., the addition of clofazimine and the replacement of rifampin with high-dose rifapentine, in the first-line regimen for drug-susceptible TB would significantly shorten the duration of treatment necessary for cure. We tested this hypothesis in a well-established BALB/c mouse model of TB chemotherapy and also in a C3HeB/FeJ mouse model in which mice can develop caseous necrotic lesions, an environment where rifapentine and clofazimine may individually be less effective. In both mouse models, replacing rifampin with high-dose rifapentine and adding clofazimine in the first-line regimen resulted in greater bactericidal and sterilizing activity than either modification alone, suggesting that a rifapentine- and clofazimine-containing regimen may have the potential to significantly shorten the treatment duration for drug-susceptible TB. These data provide preclinical evidence supporting the evaluation of regimens combining high-dose rifapentine and clofazimine in clinical trials.
“…weeks. Because the lungs of TB patients feature a heterogeneous array of lesion types resulting in diverse microenvironments and pharmacological compartments that alter the drug susceptibility and drug exposure of resident tubercle bacilli (25,26), we used both C3HeB/FeJ mice, which develop caseating lung lesions in response to infection, and BALB/c mice, which do not, to investigate the impact of host pathology on mutant selection. Despite lower CFU counts on the day after infection (W-8) in C3HeB/FeJ mice (1.67 log 10 CFU per lung) compared to BALB/c (2.26 log 10 ) (p <0.001), higher CFU counts were observed in C3HeB/FeJ mice 8 weeks later, on the day treatment started (D0), and after 3 weeks of treatment in almost all groups (p <0.001 -0.05) ( Fig.…”
Section: Spontaneous Pretomanid-resistant Mutants Exist At a Relativementioning
The nitroimidazole pro-drugs delamanid and pretomanid comprise one of only two new antimicrobial classes approved to treat tuberculosis (TB) in 50 years. Prior in vitro studies suggest a relatively low barrier to nitroimidazole resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, but clinical evidence is limited to date. We selected pretomanid-resistant M. tuberculosis mutants in two mouse models of TB using a range of pretomanid doses. The frequency of spontaneous resistance was approximately 10−5 CFU. Whole genome sequencing of 161 resistant isolates from 47 mice revealed 99 unique mutations, 91% of which occurred in 1 of 5 genes previously associated with nitroimidazole activation and resistance: fbiC (56%), fbiA (15%), ddn (12%), fgd (4%) and fbiB (4%). Nearly all mutations were unique to a single mouse and not previously identified. The remaining 9% of resistant mutants harbored mutations in Rv2983, a gene not previously associated with nitroimidazole resistance but recently shown to be a guanylyltransferase necessary for cofactor F420 synthesis. Most mutants exhibited high-level resistance to pretomanid and delamanid, although Rv2983 and fbiB mutants exhibited high-level pretomanid resistance, but relatively small changes in delamanid susceptibility. Complementing an Rv2983 mutant with wild-type Rv2983 restored susceptibility to pretomanid and delamanid. By quantifying intracellular F420 and its precursor Fo in overexpressing and loss-of-function mutants, we provide further evidence that Rv2983 is necessary for F420 biosynthesis. Finally, Rv2983 mutants and other F420H2-deficient mutants displayed hypersusceptibility to some antibiotics and to concentrations of malachite green found in solid media used to isolate and propagate mycobacteria from clinical samples.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.