A qualitative study of community perception and acceptance of biological larviciding for malaria mosquito control in rural Burkina Faso

Abstract

BackgroundVector and malaria parasite’s rising resistance against pyrethroid-impregnated bed nets and antimalarial drugs highlight the need for additional control measures. Larviciding against malaria vectors is experiencing a renaissance with the availability of environmentally friendly and target species-specific larvicides. In this study, we analyse the perception and acceptability of spraying surface water collections with the biological larvicide Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis in a single health district in Burkina Faso.MethodsA total of 12 focus group discussions and 12 key informant interviews were performed in 10 rural villages provided with coverage of various larvicide treatments (all breeding sites treated, the most productive breeding sites treated, and untreated control).ResultsRespondents’ knowledge about the major risk factors for malaria transmission was generally good. Most interviewees stated they performed personal protective measures against vector mosquitoes including the use of bed nets and sometimes mosquito coils and traditional repellents. The acceptance of larviciding in and around the villages was high and the majority of respondents reported a relief in mosquito nuisance and malarial episodes. There was high interest in the project and demand for future continuation.ConclusionThis study showed that larviciding interventions received positive resonance from the population. People showed a willingness to be involved and financially support the program. The positive environment with high acceptance for larviciding programs would facilitate routine implementation. An essential factor for the future success of such programs would be inclusion in regional or national malaria control guidelines.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5299-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Bacterial larvicides used for malaria vector control in sub-Saharan Africa: review of their effectiveness and operational feasibility

“…The cost PPPY was relatively higher in the rural (range of USD 0.77–2.50) than in the urban settings (range of USD 0.44–0.94). Five of the reviewed studies monitored the acceptability of microbial larvicide interventions to the community members and concluded that they were highly accepted by the general community [23, 28–31]. However, challenges related to accessing larval habitats in people’s compounds were reported from the large-scale larviciding intervention conducted in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania [32].…”

A participatory approach for malaria control in southern Malawi : Effects of the environment and community on larval source management

“…These results highlight how community involvement can contribute to increased intervention coverage. It has been argued that implementing LSM using the community-approach is challenging due to requirement for consent and cooperation of the community (Dambach et al 2018). Indeed, in our study, participation in LSM activities by members from the community-at-large was lower than of the selected groups, HAs and LSM committee members.…”

Narrative Review on Health-EDRM Primary Prevention Measures for Vector-Borne Diseases

“…Lack of tightly-sealed water containers: For communities with only open plastic bottles or buckets available for water storage, larvicides can be added to the stagnant water. It is important to monitor the safety of the practice and educate people on the proper usage of larvicides [ 122 ].…”