Effectiveness of an oral health intervention program for children with congenital heart defects

Abstract

BackgroundChildren with congenital heart defects (CHD) are reported to have poorer oral health compared with healthy children. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an intensive oral health care program among children with CHD followed from infancy to the age of 5 years, by comparing their oral health status at 5 years with a control group of children with CHD who had not received the program.MethodsIn this longitudinal study, children in western Norway with a need for lifelong follow-up due to congenital heart defects were invited to participate (n = 119). Children born in 2008–2011 were offered an oral health intervention program from infancy to the age of 5 years. The outcome measures for evaluating the intervention were dental caries prevalence, dental erosion, plaque index and gingival bleeding index. The data of the intervention group were compared with cross sectional oral health data of 5 year old controls with CHD born 2005–2007 (already published).ResultsEarly oral health intervention did not affect the prevalence of caries (25.3% versus 25.4%) or dental erosion (22.2% versus 19.7%) of children with CHD assessed at 5 years. Children in the intervention group were less likely than those in the control group to present with both dental plaque and gingival bleeding at age 5 years. In spite of no difference in caries prevalence between the groups, caries affected children (d1-5mft) in the intervention group had fewer teeth affected by caries than children in the control group (p = 0.06). The care index was reported to be higher in the intervention group compared with the control group, implying that fewer children in the intervention group suffered from untreated dentine caries. Parents in the intervention group were more likely to brush their children’s teeth twice a day than parents of children in the control group.ConclusionThe oral health promotive program did not influence the prevalence of caries nor dental erosion. However, the findings indicated better oral hygiene, reduced gingival bleeding and less untreated dentine caries in the intervention compared with the control group.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03311438. Registration date: October 17th 2017, retrospectively registered.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12903-018-0495-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Symptom‐orientated oral hygiene for children after heart transplantation: Effectiveness of a standardized prophylactic program

“…These encouraging results of our and other studies 48,61 provide evidence for the necessity of oral hygiene measurements in this patient group with special focus on gingival health to reduce infectious complications. Undoubtedly, there is a need of specific oral hygiene as an accepted first step in this immunocompromised group with its high infectious risk.…”

Parental Awareness of Oral Health and Nutritional Behavior in Children with Congenital Heart Diseases Compared to Healthy Children

“…Studies have shown increased poor oral hygiene and caries risk in children with CHD. In addition, the prevalence of caries in children with CHD is significantly higher than in healthy children [ 4 , 5 ]. Sivertsen et al found that this impairment of oral health status has systemic dangerous effects in one third of these children, especially episodes of increased bacteremia [ 3 , 6 ].…”

Dental caries and attendance to dental care in Finnish children with operated congenital heart disease. A practice based follow-up study

“…The result indicates further need for preventive means among caries active children. The need for preventive means among caries active CHD children is well known (Sivertsen et al 2018 ). There is too little awareness of preventative dental care and its importance among this patient population and their parents (Rai et al 2009 ; Saunders and Roberts 1997 ).…”