2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the viscoelastic mechanical properties of polycarbonate urethane for medical devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27,29 Flexibility and Viscoelasticity The viscoelastic mechanical properties of medical grade polycarbonate urethane were assessed by Beckmann et al 2018. 30 Unfortunately, there is no comparative data reported between PCU and the human disc, meaning that PCU behaves viscoelastically but the degree to which this behavior resembles the natural viscoelasticity of human tissue remains open.…”
Section: Low Frictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,29 Flexibility and Viscoelasticity The viscoelastic mechanical properties of medical grade polycarbonate urethane were assessed by Beckmann et al 2018. 30 Unfortunately, there is no comparative data reported between PCU and the human disc, meaning that PCU behaves viscoelastically but the degree to which this behavior resembles the natural viscoelasticity of human tissue remains open.…”
Section: Low Frictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conventional approaches in the mechanics of materials, constitutive laws as, for example, the relations among the state variables, the strain, and the stress tensor or that related to fluid retention behavior description, are proposed in form of mathematical expressions, which are based on phenomenological observations or experimental data 12,18,22–28 . These expressions can be subjected to hard constraints such as balance equations or thermodynamics restrictions 29–33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic behavior of a PDSS is obtained by either incorporating a rubber-like material, e.g., silicone or polycarbonate urethane (PCU), or by reducing the structural stiffness, e.g., by using mechanical springs. Numerous spinal implants incorporate PCU for its mechanical properties and biocompatibility (Beckmann et al, 2018;St. John, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the PCU materials reached the water absorption equilibrium after two weeks of soaking time in a saline bath. Beckmann et al (2018) performed material tests on Bionate® II 80A and 90A under physiological conditions to calibrate nonlinear viscoelastic finite element material models. Although the testing at physiological conditions promise a higher accuracy regarding the implant's stiffness, tests conducted in a closed volume implicate several difficulties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%