“…The Hollingshead measure is one of the most frequently used measures of socioeconomic position and has demonstrated good interrater reliability in previous research (Cirino et al, 2002). The Hollingshead in its original scoring system continue to be used as an estimate of SES across health research (Arentoft et al, 2015;Bava et al, 2018;Boylan et al, 2018;Bublitz et al, 2016;Daepp and Arcaya, 2017;Harris et al, 2014;Heptulla et al, 2016;Hur et al, 2015;Matthews et al, 2014;Mogi et al, 2019;Seyrek et al, 2017;Turkheimer et al, 2015;Turkheimer et al, 2003;Valenzuela et al, 2019). However, given more recent studies that define SES as education, income, or occupation alone (Brito et al, 2016;Merz et al, 2017;Noble et al, 2015a;Noble et al, 2015b;Noble et al, 2012;Noble et al, 2007;Noble et al, 2005;Noble et al, 2006), and the suggestion that occupation is one of the best estimates of SES as it reflects power, income, and education (https://macses.ucsf.edu/research/ socialenviron/occupation.php), we also re-coded our occupation variable using an updated system (O*NET government codes [https://www.onetcenter.org/overview.html] based off the standard occupation classification [https://www.bls.gov/soc/]) (Choi et al, 2012).…”