The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000004492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomic Study on Sphenoidal Emissary Foramen by Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Abstract: Observations in this study tender new anatomic parameters regarding SEF incidence, characteristics, and distances to proximate anatomic structures. Knowledge related to SEF variations will be helpful for neurosurgeons and radiologist.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
5
1
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
5
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike mentioned studies, Bayrak et al [16] state that the mean diameter on the right side is 2.66 mm, and 2.82 on the left side, which is bigger than the results of our study. To best of our knowledge, there are no possible explanations for the difference in the diameter of the FV in different authors in contemporary literature.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike mentioned studies, Bayrak et al [16] state that the mean diameter on the right side is 2.66 mm, and 2.82 on the left side, which is bigger than the results of our study. To best of our knowledge, there are no possible explanations for the difference in the diameter of the FV in different authors in contemporary literature.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In their research, Shinohara et al [12] and Shaik et al [13] state that the foramen representation is 33.75% and 36%, respectively, which is less than the results of our study. According to most authors, the incidence of the FV is lower (Table 4) [3,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. There is a significant discrepancy in the incidence of the FV between various authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estos hallazgos no concuerdan con lo observado en nuestro trabajo, donde no se evidenció ningún foramen con diámetro menor a 1 mm. Lazarus et al (2015) afirmó que un diámetro hasta 0,5 mm permitiría realizar técnicas quirúrgicas percutáneas de forma segura; sin embargo, nuestro estudio arrojó que la media de diámetro de los forámenes analizados fue de 2,27mm, muy similar a los resultados obtenidos por do Nascimento et al (2018) y Bayrak et al (2018) en este último las medias de los diámetros fluctuaron entre 2,68 mm y 2,88 mm siendo esto muy superior a otros estudios como Chaisuksunt et al (2012) y Shinohara et al (2010), quienes informaron diámetros de este foramen entre 0,65 mm y 1,93 mm. Con respecto a la forma 48,1% eran redondeados, mientras que 51,9% fueron irregulares.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…1). Su origen se relacionaría con el FO, ya que se formaría producto de la osificación de una espícula ósea que atravesaría al FO dando como resultado dos forámenes con características anatómicas propias, siendo uno de los motivos de la estrecha relación de ambos reparos anatómicos (Bayrak et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation