Abstract:An exchange with the over-the-guidewire method from a non-tunneled to a tunneled catheter was comparable to a de novo catheter placement technique. Therefore, this method should be viewed more favorably and should especially be considered for acute kidney injury patients.
“…Operative time during over the wire exchange (15.07 ± 1.98) minutes was markedly less than de novo technique (27.78 ± 5.71) minutes with a statistically significant P value < 0.001* that may be due to the already formed puncture and catheter track to the vein and also lesser pain to the patient as there is no puncture or repeated trials for cannulation, no need for hemostasis as the operation is often bloodless. This agree with Park et al [8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As regard to the platelet count in the 2 groups, the mean platelet count in patients with over the wire group = 146714.29 ± 72924.04 , which is lesser in value than the mean platelet count in de novo group =219454.55 ± 66433.45 , with a statistically significant P value = 0.001*, this strengthens the recommendation of using the over the wire technique in critically ill patients with multiple co-morbidities that may lead to bleeding tendency this agree with the study done by Park et al [8] who recommended the over the wire technique in critically ill patients in the ICU.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As regard to the age factor in the 2 groups, the mean age in the de novo group 54.45 ± 16.86 and mean age in over the wire group 53.25 ± 14.84 with slightly older age group in the de novo group, and there was female predominance, 14 females (63.6%) in the de novo group and 18 females (64.3%) in the over the wire group but with statistically insignificant P value for both demographic factors which is in context with a study done by Park et al2017 [8].…”
Background: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of insertion of tunneled hemodialysis catheters by de novo insertion technique and over the wire exchange technique
Methods: This prospective study included 50 patients with ERSD in need for tunneled hemodialysis catheters insertion. Patients were divided into 2 groups (the first group) 22 de novo insertion of tunneled dialysis catheters and (the second group) 28 over the wire exchange. Patients were subjected to history taking, thorough clinical examination, routine preoperative investigations, preoperative and postoperative X-ray on the neck and chest and Duplex scan of neck veins on both sides.
Results: In the de novo group, 11 patients were inserted by ultrasound guide and 11 patients were inserted by blind anatomical landmark technique in which the ultrasound guided technique showed lower rate of complications, while all over the wire group were inserted ultrasound guided. The primary patency was higher in the over the wire group(after 1 month=96%, after 3 months=89.2%, after 3 months=85.7%) than the de novo group(after 1m, 3m, 6m equals 86.3%,81.8%, 77.2% respectively) with non-significant P value 0.43, hematoma formation was higher in the de novo group with non-significant P value, 3 patients (13.6%) had infected catheters in the de novo group while 4 (14.3%) patients were affected in over the wire group, with 4 (18.2%) cases were malfunctioning in the de novo group while 3 (10.7) malfunctioning catheters in over the wire group with statistically non-significant P value in these values. There was significant difference between the 2 techniques in the operative time, for de novo insertion of tunneled dialysis catheters mean operative time was = 27.78 ± 5.71 minutes and in over the wire group the mean operative time was = 15.07 ± 1.98 minutes with statistically significant P value <0.001*.
Conclusions: By comparison between the two methods of tunneled dialysis catheters insertion in ESRD patients (de novo insertion and over the wire exchange technique), we found that over the wire exchange technique can safe time, effort, reduce the rate of operative complication especially hematoma formation and at the same time it showed higher patency rate in comparison to de novo insertion method.
“…Operative time during over the wire exchange (15.07 ± 1.98) minutes was markedly less than de novo technique (27.78 ± 5.71) minutes with a statistically significant P value < 0.001* that may be due to the already formed puncture and catheter track to the vein and also lesser pain to the patient as there is no puncture or repeated trials for cannulation, no need for hemostasis as the operation is often bloodless. This agree with Park et al [8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As regard to the platelet count in the 2 groups, the mean platelet count in patients with over the wire group = 146714.29 ± 72924.04 , which is lesser in value than the mean platelet count in de novo group =219454.55 ± 66433.45 , with a statistically significant P value = 0.001*, this strengthens the recommendation of using the over the wire technique in critically ill patients with multiple co-morbidities that may lead to bleeding tendency this agree with the study done by Park et al [8] who recommended the over the wire technique in critically ill patients in the ICU.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As regard to the age factor in the 2 groups, the mean age in the de novo group 54.45 ± 16.86 and mean age in over the wire group 53.25 ± 14.84 with slightly older age group in the de novo group, and there was female predominance, 14 females (63.6%) in the de novo group and 18 females (64.3%) in the over the wire group but with statistically insignificant P value for both demographic factors which is in context with a study done by Park et al2017 [8].…”
Background: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of insertion of tunneled hemodialysis catheters by de novo insertion technique and over the wire exchange technique
Methods: This prospective study included 50 patients with ERSD in need for tunneled hemodialysis catheters insertion. Patients were divided into 2 groups (the first group) 22 de novo insertion of tunneled dialysis catheters and (the second group) 28 over the wire exchange. Patients were subjected to history taking, thorough clinical examination, routine preoperative investigations, preoperative and postoperative X-ray on the neck and chest and Duplex scan of neck veins on both sides.
Results: In the de novo group, 11 patients were inserted by ultrasound guide and 11 patients were inserted by blind anatomical landmark technique in which the ultrasound guided technique showed lower rate of complications, while all over the wire group were inserted ultrasound guided. The primary patency was higher in the over the wire group(after 1 month=96%, after 3 months=89.2%, after 3 months=85.7%) than the de novo group(after 1m, 3m, 6m equals 86.3%,81.8%, 77.2% respectively) with non-significant P value 0.43, hematoma formation was higher in the de novo group with non-significant P value, 3 patients (13.6%) had infected catheters in the de novo group while 4 (14.3%) patients were affected in over the wire group, with 4 (18.2%) cases were malfunctioning in the de novo group while 3 (10.7) malfunctioning catheters in over the wire group with statistically non-significant P value in these values. There was significant difference between the 2 techniques in the operative time, for de novo insertion of tunneled dialysis catheters mean operative time was = 27.78 ± 5.71 minutes and in over the wire group the mean operative time was = 15.07 ± 1.98 minutes with statistically significant P value <0.001*.
Conclusions: By comparison between the two methods of tunneled dialysis catheters insertion in ESRD patients (de novo insertion and over the wire exchange technique), we found that over the wire exchange technique can safe time, effort, reduce the rate of operative complication especially hematoma formation and at the same time it showed higher patency rate in comparison to de novo insertion method.
“…In cases where an existing IJ catheter was present, we inserted guidewire via the IJ catheter and avoided separate cannulation. This technique has been documented as the “over-the-guidewire exchange method” and considered as a safe technique in terms of patency, chances of infection [ 8 ]. However, if IJ is placed high up, we prefer re-puncture of the internal jugular vein in the lower favourable site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure was done on a daycare basis. In the case of an existing temporary internal jugular catheter, a guidewire of 4F size and 15 cm length was inserted via one of the ports as mentioned in the “over-the guidewire exchange” technique [ 8 ]. If the existing IJ catheter is high up, cannulation in a favourable site in the internal jugular vein is done.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.