2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/9730525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-Assisted Optimization of the Acetabular Rotation in Periacetabular Osteotomy Using Patient’s Anatomy-Specific Finite Element Analysis

Abstract: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a complex surgical procedure to restore acetabular coverage in the dysplastic hip, and the amount of acetabular rotation during PAO plays a key role. Using computational simulations, this study assessed the optimal direction and amount of the acetabular rotation in three dimensions for a patient undergoing PAO. Anatomy-specific finite element (FE) models of the hip were constructed based on clinical CT images. The calculated acetabular rotation during PAO were 9.7°, 18°, and 4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the reorientation process of PAO, the first step is to achieve sufficient lateral coverage through coronal correction and the second step is to achieve sufficient anterior coverage through anterior rotation [9,43]. Although several finite-element analysis studies have considered multiplanar correction including the coronal and sagittal planes [27,36,56], no appropriate algorithm has been established for effectively combining sagittal and coronal acetabular correction to optimize the joint contact mechanics. A previous study using theoretical models demonstrated that anterolateral rotation of the acetabular fragment was more effective in reducing contact pressure than lateral rotation alone [15].…”
Section: Does Additional Anterior Rotation Of the Acetabular Fragment...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the reorientation process of PAO, the first step is to achieve sufficient lateral coverage through coronal correction and the second step is to achieve sufficient anterior coverage through anterior rotation [9,43]. Although several finite-element analysis studies have considered multiplanar correction including the coronal and sagittal planes [27,36,56], no appropriate algorithm has been established for effectively combining sagittal and coronal acetabular correction to optimize the joint contact mechanics. A previous study using theoretical models demonstrated that anterolateral rotation of the acetabular fragment was more effective in reducing contact pressure than lateral rotation alone [15].…”
Section: Does Additional Anterior Rotation Of the Acetabular Fragment...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referring to the reported boundary conditions, all displacements of the sacroiliac side, pubic symphysis, and distal femur were constrained, and the displacements and rotations in all directions were zero [ 20 ]. The contact between the femoral proximal end and the acetabular cartilage is defined as the contactless surface.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let’s start considering the first question: Restriction of hip motion in flexion and internal rotation can be clinically relevant in the presence of subspinous extraarticular impingement. Finite element analysis (FEA) and ROM computational simulation of common dysplastic hip models with different AIIS shapes can help identify at-risk morphologies [5]. These simulations could be performed using the Type 3 classification of AIIS morphology proposed in the present study.…”
Section: How Do We Get There?mentioning
confidence: 99%