2018
DOI: 10.2215/cjn.00480118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Effects of Cholecalciferol and Calcitriol on Circulating Markers of CKD Mineral Bone Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, clinically useful biomarkers should be modifiable and identify which patients derive clinical benefit from available therapeutic interventions, such as vitamin D supplementation. We and other investigators have shown that cholecalciferol, ergocalciferol, 1,25(OH)2D3, or paricalcitol each increase the circulating VDMR ratio 57, 58, 59, 60. The increase in serum VDMR ratio observed in this study among CRIC participants who initiated cholecalciferol between study year 1 and 4 is consistent with this literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Ideally, clinically useful biomarkers should be modifiable and identify which patients derive clinical benefit from available therapeutic interventions, such as vitamin D supplementation. We and other investigators have shown that cholecalciferol, ergocalciferol, 1,25(OH)2D3, or paricalcitol each increase the circulating VDMR ratio 57, 58, 59, 60. The increase in serum VDMR ratio observed in this study among CRIC participants who initiated cholecalciferol between study year 1 and 4 is consistent with this literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…If this hypothesis were true, this could support the use of cholecalciferol in patients with kidney disease. Alternatively, it could also suggest the presence of pathways that convert 25(OH)D 3 to 1,24,25(OH) 3 D 3 independently of a 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 intermediary as suggested by Martineau et al 16 In a study of participants with moderate to severe CKD, cholecalciferol supplementation increased levels of 25(OH)D 3 substantially, but the change in 24,25(OH) 2 D 3 was more than proportional to the increase in 25(OH)D suggesting that supplementation increased delivery of 25(OH)D to CYP24A1 and/or increased CYP24A1 activity 21 . Levels of 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 did not change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…After full‐text examination, 36 publications were excluded for the following reasons: none‐randomized controlled trials (n = 8) (Alshayeb, Josephson, & Sprague, 2013; Block, 2011; Brandenburg & Kruger, 2014; Cozzolino et al, 2009; Donate‐Correa et al, 2014; Fish & Cunningham, 2012; Galassi et al, 2017; Hamano, 2018), RCTs conducted on participants younger than 18 years (n = 1) (Lerch et al, 2018), trials conducted on patients who did not have CKD (n = 6) (Burnett‐Bowie et al, 2012; Cheng et al, 2018; Macdonald et al, 2013; Mesinovic et al, 2019; Trummer et al, 2019; Uzum et al, 2010), non‐experimental studies (n = 1) (Saki, Ranjbar Omrani, & Koohpeyma, 2019), vitamin D supplementation was combined with other treatments (n = 2) (Wetmore, Liu, Krebill, Menard, & Quarles, 2010a; Wetmore, Liu, Krebill, Menard, & Quarles, 2010b), studies without suitable group for vitamin D administration (n = 10) (Albuquerque et al, 2018; Alshayeb et al, 2014; Batacchi et al, 2017b; Bleskestad, Bergrem, Hartmann, Godang, & Goransson, 2012; Cozzolino et al, 2014; Hansen, 2011; Hansen et al, 2011; Hansen, Rasmussen, Pedersen, Rasmussen, & Brandi, 2012; Hansen, Rasmussen, Rasmussen, Bruunsgaard, & Brandi, 2014; Sprague et al, 2015), lack of control group (n = 5) (Cancela et al, 2011; Chitalia et al, 2014; De Niet et al, 2018; Garcia‐Lopes et al, 2012; Zelnick, de Boer, Kestenbaum, Chonchol, & Kendrick, 2018), vitamin D administered via injection (n = 1) (Zhang et al, 2017), and insufficient data reported in the manuscript (n = 2) (Alvarez et al, 2013; Carvalho et al, 2017). Two additional studies were extracted during the full‐text evaluation by hand‐searching the reference lists of related articles, reviews, and meta‐analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goransson, 2012;Cozzolino et al, 2014;Hansen, 2011;Hansen et al, 2011;Hansen, Rasmussen, Pedersen, Rasmussen, & Brandi, 2012;Hansen, Rasmussen, Rasmussen, Bruunsgaard, & Brandi, 2014;Sprague et al, 2015), lack of control group (n = 5)(Cancela et al, 2011;Chitalia et al, 2014;De Niet et al, 2018;Garcia-Lopes et al, 2012;Zelnick, de Boer, Kestenbaum, Chonchol, & Kendrick, 2018), vitamin D administered via injection (n = 1)(Zhang et al, 2017), and insufficient data reported in the manuscript (n = 2)(Alvarez et al, 2013;Carvalho et al, 2017). Two additional studies were extracted during the full-text evaluation by hand-searching the reference lists of related articles, reviews, and meta-analyses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%