2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2017 Cardiovascular and Stroke Endpoint Definitions for Clinical Trials

Abstract: This publication describes uniform definitions for cardiovascular and stroke outcomes developed by the Standardized Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA established the Standardized Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative in 2009 to simplify the design and conduct of clinical trials intended to support marketing applications. The writing committee recognizes that these definitions may be used in other types of clinical trials… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
189
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
189
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the number of patients and exposure times in this study were low, as were the number of adjudicated MACE. The adjudication process changed in November 2013 from consensus‐based to blinded independent review, and there were also changes in the individuals conducting adjudication as well as changes from committee‐created definitions of events to Food and Drug Administration−approved definitions . These procedural changes may have introduced variables into the adjudication outputs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the number of patients and exposure times in this study were low, as were the number of adjudicated MACE. The adjudication process changed in November 2013 from consensus‐based to blinded independent review, and there were also changes in the individuals conducting adjudication as well as changes from committee‐created definitions of events to Food and Drug Administration−approved definitions . These procedural changes may have introduced variables into the adjudication outputs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variables reported include demographic data, patients’ previous medical history, and diagnoses at admission. Mortality causes were classified according to the definitions of the Standardized Data Collection for CV Trials Initiative (SCTI) and the US Food and Drug Administration [13]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…observational vs. randomized clinical trial, should be used . For diagnostic studies, the reference standard should be clearly described and for prognostic studies, authors should report how the primary outcome was adjudicated, as applicable . A description of the key aspects of both the general study design and LUS‐specific components is provided in the reporting checklist ( Table and Figure ).…”
Section: Reporting Checklistmentioning
confidence: 99%