2018
DOI: 10.1097/yic.0000000000000212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mineralocorticoid receptor-related markers and outcome of major depression

Abstract: A close association between vegetative regulation and affect is common knowledge. Recently, the role of aldosterone and the activity of its receptor [mineralocorticoid receptor (MR)] in the clinical outcome for treatment with standard antidepressants has been shown including low systolic blood pressure and a low concentration of plasma sodium (Na), both of which appear to be related to therapy resistance to standard antidepressants. We carried out a retrospective analysis of a double-blind placebo-controlled t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In detail, we have described previously that a high ratio of salivary aldosterone/cortisol and low blood pressure may indicate a risk for antidepressant treatment resistance, potentially based on a low peripheral MR activity (11). In an independent population, we found evidence that a low ratio of plasma Na + /K + is linked to worse treatment outcome (36). Some of these markers appear to be trait or resilience markers, as they are stable over the treatment interval (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In detail, we have described previously that a high ratio of salivary aldosterone/cortisol and low blood pressure may indicate a risk for antidepressant treatment resistance, potentially based on a low peripheral MR activity (11). In an independent population, we found evidence that a low ratio of plasma Na + /K + is linked to worse treatment outcome (36). Some of these markers appear to be trait or resilience markers, as they are stable over the treatment interval (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%