2018
DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000000835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Current Center of Site Annual Neshap Dose Modeling at the Savannah River Site with Other Assessment Methods

Abstract: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires the use of the model CAP88 to estimate the total effective dose (TED) to an offsite maximally exposed individual (MEI) for demonstrating compliance with 40 CFR 61, Subpart H: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations. For NESHAP compliance at the Savannah River Site (SRS), the EPA, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), South Carolina's Department of Health and Environmental Control, and SRS approved a dose assessment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the stack height inputs at SRS, the reference heights related to operational stack heights in the tritium production facilities located in H Area were used; 0m, 15m, 21m, 31m, 56m, 59m. If there were emissions from other areas on site at a stack height not in the six previously listed, the stack height was defaulted to the shorter stack height, as shorter stack heights produce a higher estimated dose (Minter et al 2018).…”
Section: Figure 1-1 Exposure Pathways To Humans From Atmospheric and Liquid Effluentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the stack height inputs at SRS, the reference heights related to operational stack heights in the tritium production facilities located in H Area were used; 0m, 15m, 21m, 31m, 56m, 59m. If there were emissions from other areas on site at a stack height not in the six previously listed, the stack height was defaulted to the shorter stack height, as shorter stack heights produce a higher estimated dose (Minter et al 2018).…”
Section: Figure 1-1 Exposure Pathways To Humans From Atmospheric and Liquid Effluentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The change from the COS to the H area location and the change to the use of six stack heights increased the estimated dose by about 30%. (Minter et al 2018) 1.3 Dose Coefficients From 1988 through 2009, SRS used the internal and external dose conversion factors provided in DOE (1988). In 2010, the internal dose conversion factors were updated to use the dose factors from ICRP Publication 72 (ICRP 1996) and the external dose conversion factors were updated to the dose factors provided in Federal Guidance Report 12 (EPA 1993).…”
Section: Figure 1-2 Location Changes For Representative Persons For Amentioning
confidence: 99%