2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2018.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-throughput screening of T7 phage display and protein microarrays as a methodological approach for the identification of IgE-reactive components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Talwar et al (2015) developed a T7 phage displayed library to detect sarcoidosis and TB by a panel of novel antigens. San Segundo-Acosta et al (2018) identified allergenic peptides and mimotopes from olive pollen and mustard seeds using T7 phage displayed library. Cytidine-5-triphosphate synthase1-selective inhibitory peptide from random peptide library displayed on T7 phage was discovered by Sakamoto et al (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Talwar et al (2015) developed a T7 phage displayed library to detect sarcoidosis and TB by a panel of novel antigens. San Segundo-Acosta et al (2018) identified allergenic peptides and mimotopes from olive pollen and mustard seeds using T7 phage displayed library. Cytidine-5-triphosphate synthase1-selective inhibitory peptide from random peptide library displayed on T7 phage was discovered by Sakamoto et al (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 384 PrESTs arrays, normalization and quantification of all microarray images were performed using GenepixPro 7.1 software (Axon Laboratories). After calculation of the median values of the spots and background, GPR files were used to perform inter-array median normalization using Microsoft Office Excel prior to bioinformatics analyses by pomelo II () and MultiExperiment Viewer Analysis (MeV). , The comparison of the AD and control groups was performed as previously described. To identify seroreactive PrESTs to AD sera by comparing AD patients and healthy individual groups, a t test using pomelo II was performed, in which adjusted p -values of <0.05 (FDR ≤ 0.15) were obtained by permutation testing using 100,000 permutations. Pomelo II generated a heatmap, showing seroreactive PrESTs to AD or controls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After biopanning, 1 536 phages from the third and four rounds of biopanning were amplified onto 96-well plates and transferred to five 384-well plates after 1:2 dilution in PBS 0.1% Tween 20 (PBS-T) . Size diversity of cDNA-derived inserted sequences and the absence of cross-contamination among monoclonal phages (presence of more than one band) were checked by PCR using T7_up2 and T7_down2 primers. , Then, 1 920 phages and controls were printed onto SuperNitro Substrates Nitrocellulose Coating slides (Arrayit) using a MicroGrid II Spotter (GeneMachines, San Carlos, CA) at 20 °C and 50% humidity. Negative controls consisted of empty spots, PBS-Tween 0.1%, or 1 μg/μL bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis, normalization, and quantification of all microarray images were performed using GenepixPro 7.1 software (Axon Laboratories). The median values of the spots and background were determined, and interarray median normalization was performed. ,,, To identify seroreactive AD-specific phages by comparing AD patients and healthy individual groups, a t test using pomelo II () was performed, where p -values were obtained by permutation testing using 200 000 permutations. Pomelo II generated a heatmap, showing the phages with a false discovery rate (FDR) value below 0.15 and an unadjusted p -value below 0.05 to minimize for the presence of false positive results (15% of significant tests might be false positives instead of 5% of all positive phages if using only the p -value).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%