2017
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.23490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust gene expression-based prognostic risk score predicts overall survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients

Abstract: Identification of reliable predictive biomarkers and new therapeutic targets is a critical step for significant improvement in patient outcomes. Here, we developed a multi-step bioinformatics analytic strategy to mine large omics and clinical data to build a prognostic scoring system for predicting the overall survival (OS) of lung adenocarcinoma (LuADC) patients. In latter we first identified 1327 significantly and robustly deregulated genes, 600 of which were significantly associated with the OS of LuADC pat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prognostic models for LUAD has been widely studied in the context of metastasis-free, organ-specific metastasis-free, and overall survival (Chen et al, 2018; Li et al, 2017; Park et al, 2012; Shukla et al, 2017). Despite extensive researches about the combinations of gene signatures selected for prognosis prediction, the lack of robust gene signatures for LUAD overall survival prediction is still not thoroughly solved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prognostic models for LUAD has been widely studied in the context of metastasis-free, organ-specific metastasis-free, and overall survival (Chen et al, 2018; Li et al, 2017; Park et al, 2012; Shukla et al, 2017). Despite extensive researches about the combinations of gene signatures selected for prognosis prediction, the lack of robust gene signatures for LUAD overall survival prediction is still not thoroughly solved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the TNM staging system had the potential to predict the prognosis, its performance was still not satisfactory (Marchevsky, 2006). Recently, many efforts were made to identify the potential molecules that are the prognostic markers of lung cancer patients (Chen et al, 2018; Li et al, 2017; Park et al, 2012; Shukla et al, 2017). With the advances in microarray and RNA sequencing technologies, gene expression signatures were widely applied to predicting the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prognostic scores for all patients were calculated, and patients were ranked based on their scores and divided into three equal-sized cohorts. Kaplan–Meier analysis and a log-rank test were conducted to determine differences in survival, as previously described [11, 12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we employed a multistep bioinformatic strategy that uses omics information and clinical data to build a gene expression prognostic scoring system in HGSOC. We previously developed this approach to identify and successfully validate a 53-gene signature associated with OS of gastric cancer [11] and a 27-gene signature for lung adenocarcinoma [12]. Here, we used fifteen publicly available datasets of HGSOCs; six were used to identify an 11-gene signature associated with patient prognosis using Cox regression analysis and cross-validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such classification reflects both background genetics and molecular pathogenetic features. Gene expression patterns have also recently been used as prognostic biomarkers in various types of cancer [ e.g ., [refs [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] ]]. The power of such analysis has been well demonstrated with both Oncotype DX and MammaPrint assays in predicting clinical outcome of patients with breast cancer [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%