Opening the Implicit Leadership Theories’ Black Box: An Experimental Approach with Conjoint Analysis

Abstract

Although research on implicit leadership theories (ILTs) has concentrated on determining which attributes define a leadership prototype, little attention has been paid to testing the relative importance of each of these attributes for individuals’ leadership perceptions. Building on socio-cognitive theories of impression processes, we experimentally explore the formation of leadership perceptions based on the recognition of six key attributes in a series of three experimental studies comprising 566 US-based participants recruited online via Amazon Mechanical Turk. Our results show that while certain attributes play an important role in the leader categorization process, others are less relevant. We also demonstrate that some attributes’ importance is contingent on the presence of other attributes and on the leadership schema type activated in respondents’ minds. Consistent with the Leadership Categorization Theory, our findings support the premise that individuals cognitively hold a superordinate leadership prototype, which imposes constraints on their more basic level prototypes. We discuss the implications of these results for leadership theory and practice.

Behavior-Based Perceived Leadership Styles as Determinants of Organizational Functionality

“…Implicit leadership theories (ILTs) of followers are central to understanding how leaders are represented and how they are successful. Although there is a great deal of knowledge about ILTs in the business context, we know little about professorial leaders while successful leadership is essential to academic performance and success (Tavares et al, 2018).…”

Competence Profile of an Ideal Leader in a Selling Center: An Exploratory Analysis

“…It states that people usually have implicit ideas about what characteristics a leader has (Epitropaki & Martin, 2004). There is usually an idealized mental picture of a leader, which is also referred to as the prototype of leadership (Khoarakian & Sharifirad, 2018;Tavares, Sobral, Goldszmidt & Araújo, 2018). However, this idealized image of a leader changes depending on the leadership context (Liu, Ayman & Ayman-Nolley).…”

Toward A Non-Essentialist Approach to Management Education: Philosophical Underpinnings From Phenomenography

“…Is it a science, an art, a craft, or a profession? Whether it be Mangham's (1990) managerial performances, Rousseau's (2006) Fairhurst & Grant, 2010;Grint, 1997Grint, , 2000Grint, , 2005Meindl, 1995;Schyns & Meindl, 2005;Schyns & Schilling, 2011;Tavares, Sobral, Goldszmidt, & Araújo, 2018). This argues leadership is in the eye of the beholder, a quality of the observer rather than the leader.…”