2018
DOI: 10.1111/bjc.12174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expressive suppression is associated with state paranoia in psychosis: An experience sampling study on the association between adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies and paranoia

Abstract: Maladaptive emotion regulation strategies and more pronounced instability of negative emotions are relevant to paranoia in patients with psychosis and should be a special focus of CBTp interventions. Future interventions designed for patients suffering from paranoia should promote coping with unstable negative emotions and replacing or reducing maladaptive emotion regulation strategies with adaptive ones.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
58
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
2
58
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There were mixed findings among the cross‐sectional studies with some studies finding a negative relationship between cognitive reappraisal and positive symptoms ( r = −.40, p < .01; N = 46 outpatients; Grezellschak, Jansen, & Westermann, 2017) or negative symptoms ( r = −.48, p = .05; N = 33 outpatients; Perry et al, 2011), while others did not observe any relationships (Badcock et al, 2011; Henry, Rendell, Green, McDonald, & O'Donnell, 2008; Moran, Culbreth, & Barch, 2018). There was only one experimental sampling method study ( N = 32 outpatients), which observed an unexpected positive relationship between cognitive reappraisal and state paranoia ( r = .29, p < .01; Nittel et al, 2018). However, the same study did not observe a significant relationship between cognitive reappraisal and paranoia symptoms over time (Nittel et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There were mixed findings among the cross‐sectional studies with some studies finding a negative relationship between cognitive reappraisal and positive symptoms ( r = −.40, p < .01; N = 46 outpatients; Grezellschak, Jansen, & Westermann, 2017) or negative symptoms ( r = −.48, p = .05; N = 33 outpatients; Perry et al, 2011), while others did not observe any relationships (Badcock et al, 2011; Henry, Rendell, Green, McDonald, & O'Donnell, 2008; Moran, Culbreth, & Barch, 2018). There was only one experimental sampling method study ( N = 32 outpatients), which observed an unexpected positive relationship between cognitive reappraisal and state paranoia ( r = .29, p < .01; Nittel et al, 2018). However, the same study did not observe a significant relationship between cognitive reappraisal and paranoia symptoms over time (Nittel et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was only one experimental sampling method study ( N = 32 outpatients), which observed an unexpected positive relationship between cognitive reappraisal and state paranoia ( r = .29, p < .01; Nittel et al, 2018). However, the same study did not observe a significant relationship between cognitive reappraisal and paranoia symptoms over time (Nittel et al, 2018). In summary, more prospective research is needed to clarify the relationships between cognitive reappraisal and positive and/or negative symptoms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations