2018
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/key018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The assessment of nailfold capillaries: comparison of dermoscopy and nailfold videocapillaroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Slightly greater than standard (10×) magnification of dermoscopy may improve the visibility of capillary morphology, 3 and now it can be enhanced by smartphones. The majority of dermoscopic pictures (70.9%) remained previously ready for interpretation by expert observers in the study of Dinsdale et al, albeit lower than NVC (79.3%), whereas the specificity of dermoscopy was greater when compared to NVC (92.5% vs. 84.6%) 17 . All healthy controls and patients with primary RP showed no capillaroscopic changes using videodermoscopic evaluation at 30‐fold magnification in the study of Beltran et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Slightly greater than standard (10×) magnification of dermoscopy may improve the visibility of capillary morphology, 3 and now it can be enhanced by smartphones. The majority of dermoscopic pictures (70.9%) remained previously ready for interpretation by expert observers in the study of Dinsdale et al, albeit lower than NVC (79.3%), whereas the specificity of dermoscopy was greater when compared to NVC (92.5% vs. 84.6%) 17 . All healthy controls and patients with primary RP showed no capillaroscopic changes using videodermoscopic evaluation at 30‐fold magnification in the study of Beltran et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The majority of dermoscopic pictures (70.9%) remained previously ready for interpretation by expert observers in the study of Dinsdale et al, albeit lower than NVC (79.3%), whereas the specificity of dermoscopy was greater when compared to NVC (92.5% vs. 84.6%). 17 All healthy controls and patients with primary RP showed no capillaroscopic changes using videodermoscopic evaluation at 30‐fold magnification in the study of Beltran et al. The videodermoscopy also showed there a very high specificity (90.9%) in patients observed toward SSc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The dermatoscope compares favourably to nailfold videocapillaroscopy: although as might be expected it is less sensitive in identifying abnormality, it is more specific. 32,33 An ideal solution would be for specialist centres to have access to nailfold videocapillaroscopy, but for all rheumatologists to have at least a low-cost capillaroscopy system, for example, a dermatoscope or USB microscope.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Assessment Of Rpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gold standard technique is videocapillaroscopy (and is the one with which European rheumatologists with an interest in SSc are most familiar [ 7 ]), but this requires expensive equipment and it is unlikely that its use will become widespread among general rheumatologists. Low-cost hand-held microscopes can also visualise the nailfold capillaries; for example, dermoscopy compares favourably to nailfold videocapillaroscopy [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%