2018
DOI: 10.1039/c7bm01096f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of surface charge on oral absorption of polymeric nanoparticles

Abstract: Surface charge plays an important role in determining the interactions of nanoparticles with biological components. Substantial studies have demonstrated that surface charge affects the fate of nanoparticles after intravenous administration; however, few studies have investigated the effect of surface charge on the bioavailability and absorption of nanoparticles after oral administration. In this study, polymeric nanoparticles with a similar particle size and surface polyethylene glycol (PEG) density, but with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[28][29][30] Reports on various polymeric nanoparticles indicate better cel-lular uptake and biodistribution for positively charged particles. [31][32][33] Negatively charged particles were usually less toxic 34,35 and more prone to permeate tissues for targeted delivery. 36,37 Internalization pathways have also been linked to surface charge, with positively charged particles tending towards internalization via clathrin receptors, while negatively charged counterparts are prone for caveolae mediated uptake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28][29][30] Reports on various polymeric nanoparticles indicate better cel-lular uptake and biodistribution for positively charged particles. [31][32][33] Negatively charged particles were usually less toxic 34,35 and more prone to permeate tissues for targeted delivery. 36,37 Internalization pathways have also been linked to surface charge, with positively charged particles tending towards internalization via clathrin receptors, while negatively charged counterparts are prone for caveolae mediated uptake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the size and shape, the surface charge and chemistry of the NPs may influence cellular uptake, too. It was shown that positively charged NPs had a higher bioavailability in vitro and in vivo [21]. The uptake of the positively-charged particles is also enhanced compared to their negative counterparts [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11a-c), and whether the observed changes in cellular uptake correlate with electrostatic changes. As most cells have a net negative surface charge, the rate of cellular uptake for anionic and neutral nanoparticles is usually lower than that of cationic nanoparticles due to electrostatic repulsion 46,47 . The baseline uptake of pristine PS (PS lacking a protein corona) under serum-free conditions is consistent with this logic.…”
Section: Albumin Adsorption To Polymersomes Increases Their Uptake Bymentioning
confidence: 99%