Abstract:Background and study aims
Insertion of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) with push-through technique and T-fastener fixation (PEG-T) has recently been introduced in pediatric patients. The T-fasteners allow a primary insertion of a balloon gastrostomy. Due to limited data on the results of this technique in children, we have investigated peri- and postoperative outcomes after implementation of PEG-T in our department.
Patients and methods
This retrospective chart review included all patients below … Show more
“…Various methods have been proposed to prevent tube dislodgment; these include sophisticated tube designs such as low profile "button-type" tubes [128,129]. In a recent RCT, balloon-tube dislodgment was significantly less frequent in a group of patients who underwent weekly measurement of the water volume within the balloon followed by tube replacement at 3-monthly intervals [130].…”
Main recommendationsESGE recommends the “pull” technique as the standard method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the direct percutaneous introducer (“push”) technique for PEG placement in cases where the “pull” method is contraindicated, for example in severe esophageal stenosis or in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) or esophageal cancer.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the intravenous administration of a prophylactic single dose of a beta-lactam antibiotic (or appropriate alternative antibiotic, in the case of allergy) to decrease the risk of post-procedural wound infection.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE recommends that inadvertent insertion of a nasogastric tube (NGT) into the respiratory tract should be considered a serious but avoidable adverse event (AE).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that each institution should have a dedicated protocol to confirm correct positioning of NGTs placed “blindly” at the patient’s bedside; this should include: radiography, pH testing of the aspirate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring, but not auscultation alone.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends confirmation of correct NGT placement by radiography in high-risk patients (intensive care unit [ICU] patients or those with altered consciousness or absent gag/cough reflex).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that EN may be started within 3 – 4 hours after uncomplicated placement of a PEG or PEG-J.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE recommends that daily tube mobilization (pushing inward) along with a loose position of the external PEG bumper (1 – 2 cm from the abdominal wall) could mitigate the risk of development of buried bumper syndrome.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.
“…Various methods have been proposed to prevent tube dislodgment; these include sophisticated tube designs such as low profile "button-type" tubes [128,129]. In a recent RCT, balloon-tube dislodgment was significantly less frequent in a group of patients who underwent weekly measurement of the water volume within the balloon followed by tube replacement at 3-monthly intervals [130].…”
Main recommendationsESGE recommends the “pull” technique as the standard method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the direct percutaneous introducer (“push”) technique for PEG placement in cases where the “pull” method is contraindicated, for example in severe esophageal stenosis or in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) or esophageal cancer.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the intravenous administration of a prophylactic single dose of a beta-lactam antibiotic (or appropriate alternative antibiotic, in the case of allergy) to decrease the risk of post-procedural wound infection.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE recommends that inadvertent insertion of a nasogastric tube (NGT) into the respiratory tract should be considered a serious but avoidable adverse event (AE).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that each institution should have a dedicated protocol to confirm correct positioning of NGTs placed “blindly” at the patient’s bedside; this should include: radiography, pH testing of the aspirate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring, but not auscultation alone.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends confirmation of correct NGT placement by radiography in high-risk patients (intensive care unit [ICU] patients or those with altered consciousness or absent gag/cough reflex).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that EN may be started within 3 – 4 hours after uncomplicated placement of a PEG or PEG-J.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE recommends that daily tube mobilization (pushing inward) along with a loose position of the external PEG bumper (1 – 2 cm from the abdominal wall) could mitigate the risk of development of buried bumper syndrome.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.
“…The frequency of T‐fastener–related complications in their report was much higher than in the present study. In their report, the suture locks were removed later at 3 to 4 weeks postoperatively, compared to 1 to 2 weeks in our patients 11 . Livingston et al changed from cutting the T‐fastener sutures 3 to 4 weeks postoperatively to 5 days after LAPEG in pediatric patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…There have been some reports regarding T‐fastener migration 10‐12 . Kvello et al reported the outcomes of PEG with T‐fastener gastropexy in 92 pediatric patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been some reports regarding T-fastener migration. [10][11][12] Kvello et al reported the outcomes of PEG with T-fastener gastropexy in 92 pediatric patients. Of those patients, 9 (11%) developed early T-fastenerrelated complications such as infection at the site of the external suture lock, and 11 (13%) developed late T-fastener-related complications such as T-fastener migration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their report, the suture locks were removed later at 3 to 4 weeks postoperatively, compared to 1 to 2 weeks in our patients. 11 Livingston et al changed from cutting the T-fastener sutures 3 to 4 weeks postoperatively to 5 days after LAPEG in pediatric patients. After they made this change, they did not experience any T-fastener-related complications.…”
Introduction: Laparoscopy-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (LAPEG) can reduce the risk of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy-related complications, such as intra-abdominal organ injury, and determine the optimal position for placement of the gastrostomy tube. We first employed LAPEG 10 years ago but limited its application to elderly patients. Indications for LAPEG have now expanded to small children. This retrospective study aimed to determine the feasibility of LAPEG in children weighing <10 kg. Methods: Our LAPEG procedure for small children involves three essential techniques: gastric insufflation with CO 2 to prevent intestinal dilation, a T-fastener device to overcome the difficulties of gastropexy, and primary placement of a button gastrostomy to create less torque than tube gastrostomy at the insertion site and to prevent early tube dislodgement. The medical records of 48 patients with physical and mental disabilities who underwent LAPEG between 2010 and 2018 were evaluated. The outcomes of LAPEG in patients weighing <10 kg (group A, n=11) and ≥10 kg (group B, n=37) were compared. Results: The LAPEG procedure was completed in all cases without intraoperative complications or open conversion. The median bodyweight of group A was 6.3 kg (range, 3.6-8.2 kg). None of the patients in group A developed postoperative complications such as stomal infection or dislodgement. The operative time was significantly shorter in group A than in group B (P < .05). Conclusion: By improving surgical techniques for small children, our LAPEG procedure might be feasible and safe for treating children weighing <10 kg, including those weighing as little as 3.6 kg.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.