2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.12.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left Atrial Appendage Morphology and Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Pilot Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kimura et al reported that poor enhancement was not a factor relevant to stroke (15); however, in their study, this point was not a keynote, and their definition of poor enhancement is unclear. Yaghi et al reported that the prevalence of non-chicken wing LAA morphology was higher among patients with cardiogenic stroke and embolic stroke of undetermined source than among those with noncardiogenic stroke (29). The difference was not significant, but the trend was concordant to previous reports.…”
Section: Cha 2 Ds 2 -Vasc Score and Laa Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Kimura et al reported that poor enhancement was not a factor relevant to stroke (15); however, in their study, this point was not a keynote, and their definition of poor enhancement is unclear. Yaghi et al reported that the prevalence of non-chicken wing LAA morphology was higher among patients with cardiogenic stroke and embolic stroke of undetermined source than among those with noncardiogenic stroke (29). The difference was not significant, but the trend was concordant to previous reports.…”
Section: Cha 2 Ds 2 -Vasc Score and Laa Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This is a very subjective approach and even experienced cardiologists may not always agree when classifying a LAA into specific shape categories. In addition, there is a large variability in stroke occurrence within a given LAA shape category (Khurram et al, 2013 ; Nedios et al, 2014 ; Sanatkhani and Menon, 2017 ; Yaghi et al, 2018 ). This is consistent with the large variability of t m ( Figure 3C ) and LAA- ACI (data not shown) within each shape category and in LAA values that exist even within a given LAA shape category ( Figure 3C ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that patients with the chicken wing morphology are less likely to have a stroke. Although these results are promising, there is a large variability in stroke occurrence within a given LAA shape category (Khurram et al, 2013 ; Nedios et al, 2014 ; Sanatkhani and Menon, 2017 ; Yaghi et al, 2018 ). The subjective nature of LAA shape categorization may contribute to this variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Furthermore, the left atrial appendage has been classified in to 4 morphologies based on its radiographic appearance (in descending order of frequency): chicken wing, cactus, windsock and cauliflower. 3 The morphology of the left atrial appendage has been shown to be associated with the risk of embolization with pilot data suggesting that a "non-chicken-wing" morphology is most closely associated with embolic stroke (either ESUS or cardioembolic stroke) 5 , possibly mediated by a lower LAA peak flow velocity in patients with non-chicken wing morphology. The LAA can be challenging to visualize by TTE or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) owing to its length and varied morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%