2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.12.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The invasion risk of species associated with Japanese Tsunami Marine Debris in Pacific North America and Hawaii

Abstract: Marine debris from the Great Tsunami of 2011 represents a unique transport vector for Japanese species to reach Pacific North America and Hawaii. Here we characterize the invasion risk of invertebrate species associated with tsunami debris using a screening-level risk assessment tool - the Canadian Marine Invasive Screening Tool (CMIST). Higher-risk invertebrate invaders were identified for each of five different ecoregions. Some of these are well-known global invaders, such as the mussel Mytilus galloprovinci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of CMIST as a screening tool to identify high‐risk species for specific ecoregions is a recent approach to stay ahead of the invasion process (Drolet et al., 2016; Moore et al., 2018; Therriault et al., 2018). Although the use of CMIST combined with habitat modelling, as done in this study, places more emphasis on the likelihood of invasion than the likelihood of impact component of risk, such a tool may be used as a first step to develop a ranked watch list to guide early detection and monitoring efforts and to prioritize species for detailed risk assessments and potential regulations (Locke, Mandrak, & Therriault, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of CMIST as a screening tool to identify high‐risk species for specific ecoregions is a recent approach to stay ahead of the invasion process (Drolet et al., 2016; Moore et al., 2018; Therriault et al., 2018). Although the use of CMIST combined with habitat modelling, as done in this study, places more emphasis on the likelihood of invasion than the likelihood of impact component of risk, such a tool may be used as a first step to develop a ranked watch list to guide early detection and monitoring efforts and to prioritize species for detailed risk assessments and potential regulations (Locke, Mandrak, & Therriault, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These species were then ranked to evaluate invasion risk using the Canadian Marine Invasive Species Tool (CMIST; Drolet et al., 2016)—a rapid screening‐level risk assessment tool to quantify the risk of existing or potential marine invaders in a given area. The semiquantitative tool uses existing information and expert opinion to evaluate the potential for arrival, establishment, spread and impact by a given species and has been applied in a number of eco‐regions within Canada (DFO, 2017; Drolet et al., 2016; Moore, Lowen, & DiBacco, 2018; Therriault et al., 2018). CMIST scores are computed based on responses to 17 questions related to the likelihood and impact of invasion (see Figure S1.2a) according to the information found in the literature and other sources.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, other vectors and pathways have been responsible for NNS introductions, including aquaculture (Grosholz et al, 2015;Toledo-Guedes et al, 2014), live bait trade (Fowler et al, 2015;Sá et al, 2017), aquarium trade (Padilla & Williams, 2004), marine debris/litter (Carlton et al, 2018;Rech et al, 2016;Therriault et al, 2018) and canal excavation (e.g. the Suez Canal and the Panama in community composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hull fouling on recreational vessels also accounts for primary and secondary introductions (Ferrario et al, 2017; Marchini et al, 2015; Zabin et al, 2014). In addition, other vectors and pathways have been responsible for NNS introductions, including aquaculture (Grosholz et al, 2015; Toledo‐Guedes et al, 2014), live bait trade (Fowler et al, 2015; Sá et al, 2017), aquarium trade (Padilla & Williams, 2004), marine debris/litter (Carlton et al, 2018; Rech et al, 2016; Therriault et al, 2018) and canal excavation (e.g. the Suez Canal and the Panama Canal) (Galil et al, 2018; Ruiz et al, 2006), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aniel-Quiroga et al studied the interaction between tsunami waves and coastal structures as these are the first to receive the tsunami's energy [23]. e probability of invasion was lowered for the Gulf of Alaska and Hawaii [24,25]. Silva and Soares [26] described a nonlinear strip theory model in the time domain of ship motions with six degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%