2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00438-018-1420-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 and siRNA-mediated ALDH2 gene silencing in human cell lines

Abstract: Gene knockdown and knockout using RNAi and CRISPR/Cas9 allow for efficient evaluation of gene function, but it is unclear how the choice of technology can influence the results. To compare the phenotypes obtained using siRNA and CRISPR/Cas9 technologies, aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) was selected as an example. In this study, we constructed one HepG2 cell line with a homozygous mutation in the fifth exon of ALDH2 (ALDH2-KO1 cell) using the eukaryotic CRISPR/Cas9 expression system followed by the limited dil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we observed that siCCM3 treatment destroys the morphology of mitochondria, and the immunofluorescence images of CCM3-KO cells confirmed the dramatic impact of long-term loss of CCM3 on mitochondrial architecture. Although the Western Blotting results of CCM3-related signaling pathway markers in selected cells didn't resemble the siRNA treated cells, the difference in signaling pathways between CRISPR-knockout cells and siRNA-transfected cells has been demonstrated in earlier studies [37,38]. The compromised mitochondrial membrane potential in CRISPR-CCM3 EPCs was also in line with the changes in morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Additionally, we observed that siCCM3 treatment destroys the morphology of mitochondria, and the immunofluorescence images of CCM3-KO cells confirmed the dramatic impact of long-term loss of CCM3 on mitochondrial architecture. Although the Western Blotting results of CCM3-related signaling pathway markers in selected cells didn't resemble the siRNA treated cells, the difference in signaling pathways between CRISPR-knockout cells and siRNA-transfected cells has been demonstrated in earlier studies [37,38]. The compromised mitochondrial membrane potential in CRISPR-CCM3 EPCs was also in line with the changes in morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…2,3 Currently, gene editing approaches using CRISPR-Cas9 technology have greatly facilitated the targeted disruption of genes allowing the generation of cell lines with fully abrogated gene function. 26 However, to date, most knockout cell lines produced by this technology rely on constitutive Cas9 expression that is capable of inducing untoward genotoxic effects. In addition, to achieve biallelic gene disruption, cell cloning or isolation based on selectable markers is required, a possibility restricted mostly to cell lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, correlation analysis between KIAA1377 expression versus clinicopathological variables revealed that there was a significant correlation of KIAA1377 expression with lymph nodes metastases, which leads to the suggestion that KIAA1377 might be involved in the lymph node metastasis of ESCC cells. The slight discrepancy between in vivo and in vitro prompted us to rework the biological roles of KIAA1377 implicated in the proliferation and motility of SCC cells by using the alternative CRISPR‐Cas9 technique (Shalem et al, ), which is distinctively different from the shRNA system in the case of silencing efficiency (Tan and Martin, ; Wang et al, ). In the current observation, knock‐out of KIAA1377 mediated by the CRISPR‐Cas9 system turns out to be able to markedly slow down the growth and motility of KYSE‐150 and HeLa cells, preliminarily defining the oncogenic roles of KIAA1377 in SCC cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%