2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11883-018-0703-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concomitant Use of Antiplatelets and Anticoagulants in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Atrial Fibrillation: What Do Recent Clinical Trials Teach Us?

Abstract: We review clinical trials and current guidelines for antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in CHD and AF. Aspirin and P2Y inhibitors are the mainstay of antiplatelet therapy. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are the most commonly used anticoagulant, although the use of non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with AF is increasing. Recent studies provide guidance on how to address antithrombotic therapies in patients with concomitant CHD and AF. To date, we have evidence that in patients with AF who underg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, patients with AF undergoing PCI and stent implantation are recommended to receive combination antithrombotic therapy including OACs and antiplatelets. However, there are concerns about the clinical benefit of intensive combination antithrombotic therapy, as it increases the risk of fatal bleeding, which would offset the benefit in reducing the ischemic risk [69]. As non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) had shown a safety benefit in patients with AF compared with conventional vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) [10,11], recent clinical trials have investigated the clinical benefit of dual antithrombotic therapy combining NOAC and P2Y 12 antagonists (mostly clopidogrel) as an alternative to triple therapy after PCI in patients with AF [1215].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, patients with AF undergoing PCI and stent implantation are recommended to receive combination antithrombotic therapy including OACs and antiplatelets. However, there are concerns about the clinical benefit of intensive combination antithrombotic therapy, as it increases the risk of fatal bleeding, which would offset the benefit in reducing the ischemic risk [69]. As non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) had shown a safety benefit in patients with AF compared with conventional vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) [10,11], recent clinical trials have investigated the clinical benefit of dual antithrombotic therapy combining NOAC and P2Y 12 antagonists (mostly clopidogrel) as an alternative to triple therapy after PCI in patients with AF [1215].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs have been the major players in their clinical setting [1,2]. Although their efficacy is well established, their deleterious, life-threatening side-effects have also been well documented [3,4] which has prompted investigations into natural alternatives. An exploratory trial to identify new anticoagulants and anti-platelets sourced from medicinal plants is worthwhile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is also likely to be explained by the fact that most of those patients were treated with single antiplatelet therapy combined with NOACs. Thus, the use of a single antiplatelet agent with NOACs may be a more viable choice in patients with CHD, but more clinical trial data is needed to con rm individualized therapy regimens [34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%